21.11.2013 Views

pdf, 12 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL

pdf, 12 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL

pdf, 12 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 7 - Establishing an empirical formula<br />

7.6 Summary and conclusions<br />

7.6.1 Summary<br />

A dimensional analysis (§ 7.2) allowed for the identification of the main parameters influencing the<br />

scour process. These are the overall energy slope S eall , , the water depth to channel width ratio<br />

h m ⁄ B , the ratios V⋅ R h ⁄ g⋅<br />

B 3 (replacing the Reynolds number that showed an important<br />

correlation) and R c ⋅ h m ⁄ B 2 . The frequently used ratio V∗ ⁄ V and Fr d do not seem to play a<br />

determinant role. An additional parameter was found to characterize the macro-roughness: the<br />

spacing of the ribs e s . To make this ratio dimensionless it can be divided either by the channel<br />

width B, the mean water depth h m or the radius of curvature R c .<br />

In a first step, existing scour formulae were enhanced (§ 7.3.2). Table 7.6 gives a summary of the<br />

obtained results. Since the formula of KIKKAWA ET AL. (1976) is quite frequently used in practice,<br />

an effort was made to enhance its prediction capability for mountain rivers with a coarse bed by<br />

adding additional parameters. The result is quite good but it is possible to get a better prediction<br />

with other equations. BRIDGE (1976) gives the smallest error on the predicted average scour<br />

depth. Therefore, this formula was enhanced too. By introducing two additional parameters,<br />

related to the channel geometry, the correlation for the maximum scour depth can be increased to<br />

0.82 and the predicted cross-section shape fits quite well to the measured one. The predicted values<br />

fit well to the results obtained with scale model tests (Gurtnellen) and field data (Sacramento<br />

River) (§ 7.5).<br />

Since the observed cross-section is rather s-shaped than an exponential function (which is an<br />

assumption of most existing formulae), an attempt was made to establish a scour formula based<br />

on the shape of the cross-section (§ 7.3.3). It was assumed that the maximum bed slope in a radial<br />

direction is limited to a maximum value corresponding to the friction angle of the bed material.<br />

Different polynomial functions (Table 7.6) of the third and fifth degree were tested. A large set of<br />

boundary conditions was analyzed, by fixing the cross-section slope at the outer and / or inner<br />

bank and by admitting or omitting a symmetry point on the channel axis. The results range from<br />

poor to good. The best result was obtained with a polynomial function of the third degree<br />

(equation 7.20) obtaining a correlation of R 2 = 0.856 and fitting well to the measured cross-section.<br />

Unfortunately this equation shows some lacking (underestimation of the scour depth) when<br />

applied to additional laboratory and field data (§ 7.5 and Fig. 7.19).<br />

Hoping to increase the precision of the predicted scour depth, an approach based on the similitude<br />

and approximation theory of KLINE (1965) was explored (§ 7.3.4). Based on the most important<br />

forces acting on a control volume in the cross-section, dimensionless ratios between the<br />

different characteristics were derived. The advantage of this method is that the parameters<br />

obtained in this way are based on the physical process. Unfortunately the result is not very satisfying.<br />

The highest obtained correlations are of 0.72 and for the case with macro-roughness<br />

R 2 < 0.5 .<br />

page 188 / November 9, 2002<br />

Wall roughness effects on flow and scouring

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!