21.11.2013 Views

pdf, 12 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL

pdf, 12 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL

pdf, 12 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Measurement technique and data acquisition<br />

Therefore, the scale of the measurements had to be fixed to allow good quality records for high as<br />

well as for small records with positive and negative sign. Two measures were taken to reduce the<br />

value of the measured velocity.<br />

1. The UVP-probes were inclined by 20° allowing a reduction of the highest velocities to 34%<br />

(sin 20°) of the unprojected value (Fig. 4.21). The inclination was not increased to higher<br />

values because a very small error in the frame geometry would lead to an important measurement<br />

error. Furthermore, this inclination still gives a satisfying resolution for low velocities.<br />

Despite this inclination, the high velocities were somewhat too big to be measured.<br />

2. Therefore an interesting characteristic of the Doppler measurement device was explored. If<br />

the measured velocity is higher than the maximum velocity, the UVP shifts the measured<br />

value by minus 2 times the velocity range into the negative domain of the measurement<br />

(ROLLAND, 1995). If the sign of the velocity is known, the recorded velocity profile can be<br />

corrected, by shifting the negative values again into the positive domain (Fig. 4.20). This was<br />

done for the high velocities in tangential direction whose sign was clearly given (see also<br />

§ 4.6.2). The same procedure applies in analogy for negative velocities.<br />

Real velocity<br />

V max<br />

Shift +2V max to<br />

obtain real velocity<br />

Measured velocity<br />

Measurement domain<br />

-V max<br />

Figure 4.20: Shifting the measured velocity exceeding the measurement domain back to its correct position<br />

Since the UVP-probes could not be placed vertically, the vertical control volume had a diameter of<br />

up to 3 to 6 cm, depending on the considered distance to the measurement plate.<br />

<strong>EPFL</strong> Ph.D thesis 2632 - Daniel S. Hersberger November 9, 2002 / page 87

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!