pdf, 12 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL
pdf, 12 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL
pdf, 12 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chapter 3 - Theoretical considerations<br />
ODGAARD indicated that his formula may not apply in channels with heavy sediment load. Both<br />
equations 3.106 and 3.108 are valid for fully developed secondary flows in bends.<br />
ODGAARD (1984) also developed an equation for the lateral bed slope in the development region,<br />
that is the zone where the bed slope in radial direction passes from a horizontal bed to the maximum<br />
scour bed profile. He used the exponential function given by ROZOVSKII (1957) for the<br />
growth of the secondary flow. ROZOVSKII assumed that the bed shear stress depends linearly on<br />
the radial velocity component at the free surface and on the lateral bed slope.<br />
The lateral bed slope in the zone between the beginning of the bend and the first scour (called<br />
development region) is consequently given by:<br />
β<br />
dh s<br />
2 ⋅ κ<br />
sin ≈ ------- 4.8 θ Fr (3.109)<br />
dr<br />
d<br />
1<br />
2 R<br />
------------ c<br />
– exp – ⋅ ----- ⋅φ<br />
⎝<br />
⎛ n ⎠<br />
⎞ h s<br />
= ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ----<br />
r<br />
h c<br />
9) Bazilevich (1982)<br />
BAZILEVICH (1982) simplified a model established by the Institute of Fluid Mechanics, Academy<br />
of Science of the Ukrainian SSR 1 . He defined the equilibrium condition of scour as the absence of<br />
noticeable deepening of the bottom. At this state, the friction velocity V∗ at the bottom has to be<br />
equal to the friction velocity V∗ dest corresponding to the destruction of the erosion pavement.<br />
V∗ dest is given for a gravel-bed channel (with d ≥ 1.5 mm) by:<br />
0.189 ⋅ ( s – 1) ⋅g ⋅d V∗ m<br />
dest = -------------------------------------------------------<br />
(3.110)<br />
( d 25<br />
⁄ d 75<br />
) 1 ⁄ 4<br />
The friction velocity at the bottom at the given point is determined by:<br />
V∗ =<br />
V<br />
---------------<br />
⋅ g<br />
= ---------------------<br />
V⋅<br />
g ⋅f<br />
=<br />
C<br />
⁄<br />
h 1 6<br />
---------------------<br />
V⋅<br />
g<br />
K S<br />
⋅ h 1 ⁄ 6<br />
BAZILEVICH recommended to use the CHEZY-MANNING relation n = ( h2 ⁄ 3<br />
m<br />
⋅ S1 ⁄ 2 ) ⁄ V 0<br />
determine the depth averaged velocity at the maximum scour location:<br />
1 – A<br />
V hmax<br />
= ------------ ⋅ V<br />
1 + A<br />
2 + 2 ⋅ g ⋅ ∆z<br />
(3.111)<br />
to<br />
(3.1<strong>12</strong>)<br />
where A<br />
g ⋅ ln 2 β<br />
1<br />
= ----------------- , and h (3.113)<br />
⁄<br />
m<br />
= -- ⋅ ( h<br />
2 in<br />
+ h)<br />
h m<br />
4 3<br />
The length of the calculated reach is given as a function of the local water depth h<br />
the inlet h in :<br />
L = 10 ⋅ ( h – h in<br />
)<br />
and the one at<br />
(3.114)<br />
1. He does not give any reference to this complete model. Unfortunately the translated paper does<br />
not allow a detailed analysis.<br />
page 54 / November 9, 2002<br />
Wall roughness effects on flow and scouring