21.11.2013 Views

pdf, 12 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL

pdf, 12 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL

pdf, 12 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 6 - Analysis of the test results<br />

0.0<br />

h m<br />

0.1<br />

S<br />

Water depth [m]<br />

0.2<br />

h<br />

B/6<br />

B/2<br />

0.3<br />

C01b<br />

C01c<br />

C01d<br />

0.4<br />

6.5<br />

6.3<br />

6.1<br />

5.9<br />

Radius from center of the bend [m]<br />

Figure 6.4: Approximation of the real cross-section profile by a simplified one<br />

Other parameters having an influence on the scour depth are the grain size and the grain size distribution.<br />

These parameters determine the roughness of the bed and the possibility to get an<br />

armoring layer. They will be discussed in section 6.5.<br />

Finally, the macro-roughness of the outer bank has a significant influence on the scour depth. If<br />

vertical ribs are placed with an appropriate spacing (2° and 4° for the performed tests) on the<br />

outer side wall, the following observations can be made:<br />

• The erosion is well distributed over the whole bend and almost no prominent scour holes<br />

can be found (Figure 6.8 and Appendix 4).<br />

• The maximum scour depth is significantly reduced, especially for high bed slopes and high<br />

discharges (Figure 6.5), where the reduction of the scour depth can reach up to 38%.<br />

But it is important to use an optimum rib-spacing. GAIROLA (1996) (see also § 6.6 c) investigated<br />

vertical ribs of different shape in a straight channel. He observed the highest impact on the flow<br />

(in terms of head losses) if the ratio of rib-depth to rib-spacing is of about <strong>12</strong>. This order of magnitude<br />

is confirmed by our tests, but the optimum ratio can also be somewhat bigger<br />

( ⁄ = 10 ÷ 20 ), depending on the tangential bed slope and on the curvature.<br />

e s<br />

e d<br />

5.7<br />

5.5<br />

page 118 / November 9, 2002<br />

Wall roughness effects on flow and scouring

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!