pdf, 12 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL
pdf, 12 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL
pdf, 12 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Bed topography in the bend<br />
Based on the works of ALLEN (1970), BRIDGE further gave a relation for the size of moving bed<br />
particles. The formula was established, neglecting the lift force.<br />
3 ⋅ ρ<br />
d<br />
w<br />
⋅S e<br />
⋅h = --------------------------------------------- s<br />
(3.74)<br />
2 ⋅ tanφ<br />
⋅( ρ s<br />
– ρ w<br />
)<br />
Finally, BRIDGE compared his formula to field data, measured in the River Endrick in Scotland<br />
(BLUCK, 1971), in the River Desna, USSR (ROZOVSKII, 1957) and the River South Esk in Glen<br />
Clova, Scotland. Cross-sections were chosen in areas of fully developed spiral flow. All the rivers<br />
had ripples and dunes, indicating that the flow is in the lower flow regime. The grain size of River<br />
South Esk is of 1 mm, the one of River Endrick is coarser, whereas the one of the Desna River is<br />
finer. The longitudinal bed slope of River Esk is of 0.025 to 0.030 %. Bridge used values of tanφ<br />
between 0.4 and 0.5 in order to obtain a good prediction. He further proposed to adjust the values<br />
of tanφ to increase the precision of the prediction of the radial bed topography.<br />
5) Kikkawa, Ikeda & Kitagawa (1976)<br />
KIKKAWA ET AL. (1976) defined the velocity distribution based on the equation of motion in<br />
radial direction, by means of a simplified stream function of the secondary flow. They assumed a<br />
constant eddy viscosity and a logarithmic velocity distribution, which is modified in radial direction<br />
with a special distribution function. Their equation was established for sand bed rivers and<br />
tested against laboratory data on fixed and mobile bed ( Fr = 0.56 ÷ 0.63 ; B ⁄ h = 16 ÷ 20 ). The<br />
velocity distribution in stream direction at the location with flow depth is described by:<br />
v<br />
------ θ<br />
V*<br />
=<br />
------<br />
V<br />
V*<br />
+<br />
where v θ is the velocity in stream direction at level z, V* the shear velocity averaged in radial<br />
direction and V the average velocity in the cross-section ( V = Q⁄<br />
A)<br />
.<br />
--<br />
1<br />
κ<br />
⋅ ⎛ln-----<br />
z<br />
⎝<br />
+ 1⎞<br />
⎠<br />
(3.75)<br />
The velocity profile at the location r in the cross-section becomes after introduction of a distribution<br />
function fr ():<br />
v<br />
------ θ<br />
f()<br />
r<br />
V 1<br />
= ------ + -- ⋅ ⎛ln z<br />
----- + 1⎞<br />
(3.76)<br />
V* V* κ ⎝ ⎠<br />
where h is the local flow depth. The distribution function f()<br />
r corresponds to the velocity distribution<br />
normalized by the average velocity V .<br />
v θ<br />
h m<br />
h m<br />
h m<br />
<strong>EPFL</strong> Ph.D thesis 2632 - Daniel S. Hersberger November 9, 2002 / page 47