21.11.2013 Views

pdf, 12 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL

pdf, 12 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL

pdf, 12 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 7 - Establishing an empirical formula<br />

There are finally three parameters which need to be fixed: c c , c (in tanφ∗<br />

) and ξ . The best found<br />

combination of the different parameters is: ξ = 8.6 %, c = 0.843 – 0.272 ⋅ V⋅<br />

R h ⁄ g⋅<br />

B 3 and<br />

c c = 28 ⋅V⋅R h ⁄ g ⋅ B 3 – 9 ⋅ h m ⁄ B – 10 . But the correlation for the maximum scour depth is<br />

only 0.76. For all tested combinations of parameters, the shape of the cross-section fitted badly to<br />

the measured bed level.<br />

g) Conclusions<br />

By using polynomial functions to fit an equation to the cross section shape quite decent correlations<br />

can be obtained. The maximum scour depth can be predicted with good precision, but it is<br />

rather difficult to obtain a good fit to the shape of the cross section. Polynomial functions of the<br />

third degree give the best results. But a radial and vertical adjustment is necessary to obtain a satisfying<br />

scour formula.<br />

Introducing additional terms (e.g. x 3 + x 2 + x instead of x 3 + x ) does not lead to a better prediction<br />

capability but to an important increase of the complexity of the formula. The same observation<br />

applies for polynomes of a higher degree (the fifth degree was analyzed). They only result in<br />

more complicated equations without improving the prediction of the maximum scour depth, nor<br />

the fit to the cross section shape.<br />

The best results were obtained with equation 7.15 and the constant given by equation 7.20. Combining<br />

the two equations and performing some simplifications results in:<br />

(<br />

h s h m φ c 6.23 B r – R c – 8.8B) 3<br />

= + tan ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ –-------------------------------------- + ( r–<br />

R<br />

260 ⋅ B 2<br />

c – 8.8B)<br />

(7.31)<br />

h smax<br />

,<br />

= h m + tanφ ⋅c ⋅[ 0.<strong>12</strong>9 ⋅ B]<br />

(7.32)<br />

where c 290 ⎛1 3.2 h m<br />

– ⋅ -----⎞<br />

V⋅<br />

R h<br />

= ⋅<br />

⎝<br />

(7.33)<br />

B ⎠<br />

⋅ -----------------<br />

g⋅<br />

B 3<br />

The local scour depth depends on the ratio water depth to channel width and the dimensionless<br />

parameter V⋅ R h ⁄ gB 3 . The maximum lateral bed slope is given at the inflection point of the<br />

polynomial function with a value of tanφ∗<br />

= c ⋅ tanφ<br />

. It is important to note that the equation<br />

for the maximum scour depth does not consider the radius of curvature .<br />

R c<br />

page 170 / November 9, 2002<br />

Wall roughness effects on flow and scouring

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!