21.11.2013 Views

pdf, 12 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL

pdf, 12 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL

pdf, 12 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Recommendations for practical engineers<br />

8.3 Recommendations for practical engineers<br />

a) Advantages and inconveniences of macro-roughness on outer walls<br />

Vertical ribs placed on the outer side wall with an optimum spacing have the following advantages:<br />

• The maximum scour depth is significantly reduced (20 to 40% for an optimum rib-spacing).<br />

• Prominent scour holes almost disappear.<br />

• Important oscillations of the bed level during development of the scour are considerably<br />

reduced or even suppressed for high discharges.<br />

• The amplitude of the stationary surface waves is diminished by half. But at the same time,<br />

the mean water level increases, resulting in about the same maximum water levels in the<br />

curve as without ribs.<br />

• High main velocities are shifted from the outer wall to a distance of about an average water<br />

depth from the outer bank.<br />

• The armoring layer zone next to the outer wall due to grain sorting is doubled, now covering<br />

about half of the channel.<br />

But the macro-roughness on the outer wall has also some negative effects, such as:<br />

• A significantly reduced transport capacity in the bend. This reduction is compensated in<br />

natural rivers by a steepening of the bed slope obtained by depositions upstream of the<br />

curve (see also preliminary tests).<br />

• Some additional erosion can be found after the bend in the center of the channel. But with<br />

the possible exception of bridge piers, no civil engineering structures are endangered by this<br />

limited local erosion.<br />

b) Estimation of the maximum scour depth, transversal bed slope and scour locations<br />

If existing scour formulae are applied to mountain rivers, attention needs to be paid to the fact<br />

that most of them underestimate the maximum scour depth by a factor of up to 2.4. In order to<br />

adjust the maximum scour obtained using existing equations, the result can be multiplied with a<br />

correction factor given in Table 3.7 on page 64 (in general R 2 < 0.8 , except for Peter’s formula<br />

with a higher correlation).<br />

Without macro-roughness, equation 7.7 can be used to compute the maximum scour depth and<br />

the transversal bed slope. This formula combines both, a good prediction of the maximum scour<br />

depth and a good fit with the cross-section at the maximum scour locations.<br />

It is difficult to compute the reduction of the scour depth directly. Therefore formula 7.63 is proposed<br />

to compute the scour depth in the presence of vertical ribs.<br />

The location of the two scour holes can also be predicted by two relations (equations 7.54 and<br />

7.57). The prediction of the first scour gives quite good results ( R 2 = 0.83 ), but the forecast of<br />

the second one is more difficult ( R 2 = 0.60 ).<br />

During the development of the scour holes, important bed fluctuations were observed for the<br />

tests without macro-roughness. They can reach amplitudes of up to 50% of the mean water depth<br />

<strong>EPFL</strong> Ph.D thesis 2632 - Daniel S. Hersberger November 9, 2002 / page 199

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!