21.11.2013 Views

pdf, 12 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL

pdf, 12 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL

pdf, 12 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 5 - Test results<br />

5.1 Introduction<br />

The present section briefly describes the obtained results and special observations that were made<br />

during the tests. The first section (§ 5.2) presents the preliminary tests, which served to establish<br />

the whole test procedure and to adjust and refine the measurements and the measurement technique.<br />

The main tests, described in section 5.3 are made for different bed slopes, discharges and<br />

rib-spacings. Finally an additional set of tests was performed to study the influence of the depth of<br />

the macro-roughness elements (§ 5.4). A detailed analysis of the tests is performed in chapter 6.<br />

Some limits were fixed for the tests:<br />

• The flow regime is maintained subcritical (Froude < 1).<br />

• The maximum discharge of the pumps was of 210 l/s.<br />

• The discharge had to be big enough in order to obtain any sediment transport.<br />

All these conditions were evaluated in the following table, which shows the sediment transport<br />

rate in g/min. The underlayed zones (in the right part of the table) represent Froude numbers<br />

higher than 0.8, 0.9 and 1.0. Two lines were added to the plot to indicate the used minimum and<br />

maximum discharge. On the horizontal axis, the bed slope is given, and on the vertical one, the<br />

flow depth. The domain of the tests is highlighted with bold characters (center of the table). Since<br />

the armoring layer is destroyed in the beginning of the tests, the following table gives the sediment<br />

transport rates without armoring (with d 30<br />

= 4.4 mm, d m = 8.5 mm, d 90<br />

= 14.8 mm).<br />

hw Qb [g/min]<br />

[m] So = 0.2% So = 0.3% So = 0.35% So = 0.4% So = 0.45% So = 0.5% So = 0.55% So = 0.6% So = 0.65% So = 0.7% So = 0.8% So = 0.9%<br />

0.05 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

0.06 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

0.07 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

0.08 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 605<br />

0.09 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 508 4 257<br />

0.10 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 927 3 704 7 211<br />

0.11 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 17 1 232 2 653 6 <strong>12</strong>2 10 440<br />

0.<strong>12</strong> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 16 1 288 2 794 4 537 8 742 13 922<br />

0.13 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 <strong>12</strong>1 2 670 4 485 6 568 11 550 17 636 Q=150<br />

0.14 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 768 2 314 4 155 6 294 8 734 14 531 21 566<br />

0.15 - - - - - - - - - - - - 275 1 770 3 588 5 735 8 213 11 026 17 673 25 697<br />

0.16 - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 091 2 836 4 938 7 403 10 234 13 436 20 964 30 015 Q=210<br />

0.17 - - - - - - - - - 338 1 956 3 961 6 358 9 153 <strong>12</strong> 350 15 954 24 396 34 507<br />

0.18 - - - - - - - - - 1 016 2 868 5 142 7 845 10 981 14 556 18 575 27 959 39 163<br />

0.19 - - - - - - 86 1 729 3 823 6 375 9 393 <strong>12</strong> 881 16 846 21 292 31 645 43 974<br />

0.20 - - - - - - 620 2 475 4 819 7 657 10 999 14 849 19 214 24 099 35 448 48 929<br />

0.21 - - - - - - 1 178 3 253 5 852 8 986 <strong>12</strong> 660 16 882 21 657 26 992 39 360 54 021<br />

0.22 - - - 11 1 759 4 059 6 922 10 357 14 373 18 975 24 170 29 965 43 375 59 242<br />

0.23 - - - 421 2 362 4 893 8 026 11 770 16 134 21 <strong>12</strong>5 26 750 33 015 47 488 64 586<br />

0.24 - - - 848 2 986 5 754 9 163 13 222 17 942 23 329 29 392 36 136 51 693 70 045<br />

0.25 - - - 1 289 3 630 6 639 10 329 14 711 19 793 25 585 32 093 39 326 55 987 75 614<br />

0.26 - - - 1 745 4 292 7 548 11 525 16 235 21 686 27 889 34 852 42 580 60 363 81 287<br />

0.27 - - - 2 215 4 972 8 479 <strong>12</strong> 748 17 791 23 619 30 240 37 664 45 897 64 819 87 060<br />

0.28 - - - 2 697 5 669 9 431 13 998 19 380 25 589 32 635 40 527 49 272 69 351 92 927<br />

0.29 - - - 3 192 6 382 10 404 15 272 20 998 27 595 35 072 43 438 52 702 73 954 98 884 Fr > 1.0<br />

0.30 - - - 3 698 7 110 11 396 16 570 22 646 29 635 37 549 46 397 56 187 78 626 104 927<br />

0.31 - - - 4 215 7 853 <strong>12</strong> 406 17 890 24 320 31 708 40 064 49 399 59 722 83 364 111 052<br />

0.32 - - - 4 743 8 609 13 433 19 233 26 021 33 8<strong>12</strong> 42 616 52 444 63 306 88 164 117 255<br />

0.33 8 5 282 9 379 14 478 20 596 27 747 35 945 45 202 55 529 66 936 93 024 <strong>12</strong>3 533<br />

0.34 215 5 830 10 161 15 538 21 978 29 497 38 107 47 822 58 654 70 611 97 941 <strong>12</strong>9 883<br />

no sediment transport sediment transport Fr > 0.8 Fr > 0.9<br />

Table 5.1: Computed sediment transport capacity (without armoring) - overview over the test domain<br />

Q b , Fr and h w<br />

Table 5.2 gives the same information but computed with an armoring layer (computed according<br />

to Gessler, 1990, see section 3.3, d 30<br />

= 5.5 mm, d m = 11.5 mm, d 90<br />

= 18.1 mm). This allows<br />

page 100 / November 9, 2002<br />

Wall roughness effects on flow and scouring

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!