21.11.2013 Views

pdf, 12 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL

pdf, 12 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL

pdf, 12 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Summary and discussion<br />

6.7.3 Discussion<br />

a) Scour mechanism<br />

It has been shown in this section that the scour formation and development depend on many factors<br />

acting in a combined way:<br />

• the tangential velocity components play a major role in the scour process,<br />

• the secondary currents are important; but they explain only in part the modification of the<br />

flow field due to the presence of macro-roughness,<br />

• the velocity fluctuations contribute to the scour process, too.<br />

The first scour formed between 30° and about 40° in the tests. At the beginning of the bend, the<br />

secondary current starts and grows towards this first maximum scour at the outer bank. Since the<br />

point bar towards the inner channel wall is located after the maximum scour location, the flow is<br />

not particularly perturbated and the velocity fluctuation can be assumed to be less important than<br />

in the second scour. But the highest tangential velocities are located close to the bed surface<br />

inducing an important solicitation of the bed.<br />

Already at the first scour location, an additional secondary cell (inner bank cell) emerges. This cell<br />

hinders the main cell to grow, since it has the same direction.<br />

Finally the main secondary cell grows again towards the second scour. But the intensity of the circulation<br />

is weaker than in the first scour. This second scour is located after the second point bar.<br />

Therefore the flow field is perturbed and the velocity fluctuations are getting important for the<br />

scour process. The main (tangential) velocities are of about the same intensity close to the bed surface.<br />

Comparing the two scour holes, it can be concluded that the first one is dominated by the flow<br />

field and especially by the secondary currents developing their strongest intensity in the first maximum<br />

scour. The second scour, is most likely dominated by the velocity fluctuations induced by<br />

the discontinuity created behind the second point bar.<br />

Both scour holes stabilize, once the bed surface armored. It takes a few hours to armor the first<br />

scour hole, but about twice as long for the second one. This armoring layer formed of coarse sediments<br />

(about twice the mean diameter of the substrate) can be observed in the outer part of the<br />

bend, whereas the point bars are formed of fine sediments (about two third of the mean diameter).<br />

b) Influence of the macro-roughness<br />

Vertical ribs placed with an optimal spacing on the outer side wall have the following influences<br />

on the scour:<br />

• The maximum scour depth is considerably reduced (up to 38% for the highest discharges<br />

and slopes).<br />

• The first scour location shifts in the downstream direction (by 15 to 40°), but the second<br />

scour remains about at the same place.<br />

• As for the scour, the first point bar moves in the downstream direction; but for the second<br />

one it remains at the same position.<br />

<strong>EPFL</strong> Ph.D thesis 2632 - Daniel S. Hersberger November 9, 2002 / page 147

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!