21.11.2013 Views

pdf, 12 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL

pdf, 12 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL

pdf, 12 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Summary and discussion<br />

d) Sediment transport<br />

The sediment transport rate during the test decreases with an exponential function, too. The<br />

behavior is like the one without ribs, except that the transport capacity is considerably reduced.<br />

For the performed tests the reduction of the transport capacity was up to 50 to 65%. In a natural<br />

river, the upstream reach will continue bringing sediments to the bend. But since the transport<br />

capacity in the bend is insufficient, the sediment will deposit in a first stage upstream the bend and<br />

increase in this way the overall bed slope. With an increased slope, the transport capacity is<br />

increased again, and the entire bedload transits through the bend. The observed necessary increase<br />

of the overall bed slope was the same order of magnitude as the reduction of the transport capacity.<br />

Since the observations on the steepening of the slope are based on one test series (the preliminary<br />

tests), these results should be confirmed by additional research (§ 6.4).<br />

e) Grain sorting<br />

The macro-roughness has no significant influence on the grain sorting process, beside the fact that<br />

the zone in the scour holes where a coarse armoring layer can be observed is extended to about<br />

50% of the channel instead of 25% without ribs. But this is rather due to a flatter transversal bed<br />

slope than to a modified behavior concerning grain sorting (§ 6.5).<br />

f) The flow field<br />

Ribs on the outer wall influence the tangential velocity field considerably. If the ribs density is 4°,<br />

the maximum velocities remain close to the free surface all over the bend. With additional ribs, the<br />

maximum velocity shifts towards the bottom but at a distance of about the average flow depth h m<br />

of the outer wall (§ 6.6 a).<br />

In the presence of macro-roughness the secondary current does not seem to undergo an important<br />

modification. Only in at the first scour location a slight decrease in the intensity can be<br />

observed. But the near bed velocities in radial direction remain about the same as without ribs.<br />

An interesting phenomenon which was not yet visible for the case without macro-roughness 1 is<br />

the small secondary cell on top of the outer wall (Figure 6.22). This cell is of about constant intensity<br />

all over the bend. If the rib spacing becomes very small (1°), the intensity of this cell decreases<br />

again (§ 6.6 b).<br />

g) The special case of the smallest rib spacing of 1°<br />

In the special case of the smallest rib spacing of 1°, as the ribs are very close to each other, the isolated<br />

effect of each roughness is lost to the profit of a continuous roughness along the outer wall.<br />

The first scour location shift even farther downstream and the scour depth increases again. This<br />

indicates that the ribs loose their efficiency. It is obvious that if the separation zone cannot reattach<br />

at the outer wall before hitting the next vertical rib, the energy dissipation will not be optimal.<br />

But this does not yet explain why the scour gets deeper than without macro-roughness. It could be<br />

mentioned that the channel width is reduced due to the ribs. But the decrease by 2% of the chan-<br />

1. ...since the phenomenon was too weak and the measurements too far away from the outer wall.<br />

<strong>EPFL</strong> Ph.D thesis 2632 - Daniel S. Hersberger November 9, 2002 / page 145

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!