20.12.2013 Views

IATP Hog Report - Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy

IATP Hog Report - Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy

IATP Hog Report - Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Section 0<br />

algae growth <strong>and</strong> can damage or alter natural habitats, <strong>for</strong> instance,<br />

causing nitrogen-loving plants to replace the existing flora in a given area.<br />

Methane is a significant greenhouse gas that is emitted by liquid manure<br />

storage.<br />

The most significant contribution to the reduction in greenhouse gasses<br />

that farms can make is to change manure management. The change can go<br />

in two directions: away from liquid manure <strong>and</strong> open lagoon storage<br />

toward more costly <strong>and</strong> complex management systems, such as electricity<br />

generation from methane, or toward ecologically sound <strong>and</strong> less complex<br />

management systems, such as manure h<strong>and</strong>ling incorporating straw or<br />

other natural bedding <strong>and</strong> composting. The latter direction is least costly<br />

<strong>for</strong> small livestock farms <strong>and</strong> not only reduces greenhouse gases, but<br />

replenishes the soil carbon.<br />

V. <strong>Hog</strong> Factory in the Back Yard<br />

Part Five: <strong>Hog</strong> factories have divided communities, neighborhoods, <strong>and</strong><br />

families. In most cases the people who feel the strongest impacts from hog<br />

factories are people who have lived in their rural homes <strong>for</strong> most, if not<br />

all, of their lives, many of whom farm or have farmed, with livestock, as<br />

well.<br />

Part Five describes the ways in which corporate hog factory owners have<br />

used the public's sympathy <strong>for</strong> family farmers to obtain exemptions <strong>for</strong><br />

their activities from local zoning laws <strong>and</strong> from county <strong>and</strong> state<br />

regulations. For example, thirty states have enacted laws exempting farm<br />

animals from protection under their anti-cruelty statutes. "Strategic<br />

lawsuits against public participation," or SLAPP suits, can be brought<br />

against citizens who protest siting of animal factories in their<br />

communities. In at least 13 states, agricultural disparagement laws,<br />

popularly known as "veggie libel laws," protect food products <strong>and</strong><br />

production processes from "disparagement." The very laws enacted to<br />

protect small farmers from frivolous complaints serve to protect corporate<br />

hog factories from well-grounded complaints over their much larger<br />

impacts on the environment <strong>and</strong> on public health <strong>and</strong> welfare. Such laws<br />

erode democratic processes.<br />

Public policies supporting hog factories <strong>and</strong> excusing them from bad<br />

behavior also help create an illusion that hog farming is industrializing<br />

because technological advances have increased the efficiency (that is, have<br />

reduced per-unit costs of production) of larger, more concentrated<br />

operations. How many of these efficiencies are based on the ease with<br />

which public policies allow hog factory operators to pass off unwanted<br />

costs of doing business onto neighbors <strong>and</strong> society (i.e., make others pay)<br />

have not been quantified. It is becoming clear, however, that by helping<br />

http://www.iatp.org/hogreport/sec0.html (7 of 11)2/27/2006 3:50:00 AM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!