20.12.2013 Views

IATP Hog Report - Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy

IATP Hog Report - Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy

IATP Hog Report - Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Section 2<br />

destroyed, leaving behind "empty calorie" food. 167 And, because ionizing<br />

radiation dislodges electrons from molecules, irradiation leads to the<br />

<strong>for</strong>mation of bizarre new chemicals in food called "unique radiolytic<br />

products," which the U.S. Food <strong>and</strong> Drug Administration has never<br />

studied <strong>for</strong> potential toxicity. 168 The FDA has also failed to determine a<br />

level of radiation to which food can be exposed <strong>and</strong> still be safe <strong>for</strong> human<br />

consumption, which federal law requires. 169 And, the FDA has ignored<br />

research dating to the 1950s revealing a wide range of problems in animals<br />

that ate irradiated food, including premature death, a rare <strong>for</strong>m of cancer,<br />

reproductive dysfunction, chromosomal abnormalities, liver damage, low<br />

weight gain <strong>and</strong> vitamin deficiencies. 170<br />

All told, irradiation promises to do more harm than good. The food<br />

industry needs to clean up its operations with thoughtful solutions that will<br />

preserve the integrity not only of the food production system, but of our<br />

food supply itself.<br />

Some Strategies <strong>and</strong> Alternatives <strong>for</strong> Improving the Safety <strong>and</strong><br />

Quality of Animal Production<br />

Occupational Safety <strong>and</strong> Health<br />

http://www.iatp.org/hogreport/sec2.html (22 of 38)2/27/2006 3:50:06 AM<br />

1. Get strict occupational safety <strong>and</strong> health st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>and</strong><br />

en<strong>for</strong>cement applied to confinement livestock operations.<br />

Rationale: The burden of safety must rest with employers who<br />

choose to use <strong>and</strong> who profit by using cheap liquid manure<br />

h<strong>and</strong>ling <strong>and</strong> intensive confinement.<br />

2. Ban h<strong>and</strong>ling of manure as a liquid.<br />

Rationale: H<strong>and</strong>ling manure as a solid will reduce the hazards<br />

associated with storage <strong>and</strong> disposal of animal feces <strong>and</strong> urine to<br />

workers, farm animals, <strong>and</strong> the environment <strong>and</strong> will eliminate<br />

fatalities associated with manure pits.<br />

3. Require reduction in the stocking density in livestock confinement<br />

buildings to reduce the percentage of airborne dust, animal d<strong>and</strong>er,<br />

<strong>and</strong> feed particles in confinement building air, thus lessening<br />

exposure.<br />

4. Continue to support research to quantify airborne contaminants in<br />

confinement buildings, determine their impacts on human <strong>and</strong><br />

animal health, <strong>and</strong> reduce their numbers. Support research<br />

comparing respiratory health impacts of alternative methods of<br />

production.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!