20.12.2013 Views

IATP Hog Report - Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy

IATP Hog Report - Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy

IATP Hog Report - Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Section 1<br />

that it would take nine 300-sow hog farms to generate the equivalent local<br />

tax benefits of one large 3,400-sow operation, Thompson <strong>and</strong> Haskins<br />

point out that the flip side of this claim, regarding the apparent efficiency<br />

of factory hog farms, is that nine smaller farms could generate the same<br />

tax benefits with fewer (2,700) sows than the larger operation. 83<br />

Concentration in animal agriculture is continuing, nearly unabated, <strong>and</strong><br />

often aided by the very institutions that are supposed to protect the public<br />

against corporate power <strong>and</strong> abuses. The continuing loss of independent<br />

family farmers has far-reaching impacts on us all. We have yet to<br />

comprehend what the ongoing concentration of ownership of the basic<br />

factors of production, in the h<strong>and</strong>s of fewer <strong>and</strong> more powerful corporate<br />

entities, will mean <strong>for</strong> the future of democracy <strong>and</strong> personal liberty.<br />

In January 1998, the report of the U.S. Department of <strong>Agriculture</strong> National<br />

Commission on Small Farms expressed urgency about the choice be<strong>for</strong>e<br />

us: 84<br />

The dominant trend is a few, large, vertically integrated<br />

firms controlling the majority of food <strong>and</strong> fiber products in<br />

an increasingly global processing <strong>and</strong> distribution system.<br />

If we do not act now, we will no longer have a choice<br />

about the kind of agriculture we desire as a Nation.<br />

Some Strategies <strong>and</strong> Action Alternatives Supportive of<br />

Independent Family Farmers<br />

1. Support research <strong>and</strong> development of production systems <strong>and</strong><br />

technologies that are appropriate <strong>for</strong> the size <strong>and</strong> scale of<br />

independent family farmers <strong>and</strong> consistent with their values.<br />

Rationale: The technologies being developed today are not size<br />

neutral with respect to substitution of capital <strong>for</strong> labor, with the<br />

result that independent farmers can get in over their heads <strong>and</strong><br />

carry huge debt loads if they adopt them. The only factor of<br />

production <strong>for</strong> which the independent farmer can set the price is<br />

his or her own time or labor. Technologies that improve<br />

production by stressing management <strong>and</strong> skilled labor over capital<br />

investments are potentially empowering to independent farmers. In<br />

some cases, these production systems will help qualify the farmer<br />

to take advantage of special marketing opportunities, such as<br />

organic or antibiotic-free or with endorsements by bonafide animal<br />

welfare groups, where prices above market price are offered.<br />

2. Support the promotion of alternative markets <strong>and</strong> independent,<br />

quality-oriented, farmer-owned packinghouses.<br />

http://www.iatp.org/hogreport/sec1.html (14 of 23)2/27/2006 3:50:02 AM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!