IATP Hog Report - Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy
IATP Hog Report - Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy
IATP Hog Report - Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Section 1<br />
programs were put in place that promoted the industrialization of animal<br />
agriculture. 11,12 These included: investment tax credits <strong>for</strong> confinement<br />
building technology; rapid depreciation on confinement facilities; writeoffs<br />
of capital investments as cash expenses; inclusion of closely held<br />
corporations in the definition of family farms eligible to use cash<br />
accounting; capital gains exemptions on sales of breeding stock; price<br />
support programs that made l<strong>and</strong> more profitable <strong>for</strong> growing crops than<br />
<strong>for</strong> raising animals <strong>and</strong> rein<strong>for</strong>ced the move to intensive confinement; <strong>and</strong><br />
crop deficiency payments that served as "de facto" subsidies from<br />
taxpayers to livestock farmers by keeping grain (feed) prices low, further<br />
encouraging expansion.<br />
Perhaps as important, there seemed to be a philosophical premise<br />
underlying farm programs which has persisted to the present: that aid to<br />
farmers, in the name of preserving family farms, should be awarded on the<br />
basis of production volume rather than income, stewardship of natural<br />
resources, or some other, desirable social goal. This philosophy had the<br />
effect of channeling aid into the h<strong>and</strong>s of the highest volume farmers. 13<br />
During the years 1975 to 1980, in particular, major expansion occurred in<br />
the hog industry. 14 Two-thirds of the total building capacity was in capital<br />
intensive structures specialized to hog production. Specialization<br />
permitted greater separation of ownership, management, <strong>and</strong> labor.<br />
Government policies <strong>and</strong> the new mass production technologies were<br />
attracting new investors to hog farming. More than half of U.S. farms<br />
selling 5,000 or more hogs in 1978 had not been in hog production in<br />
1975; some had not been in the business of farming at all in 1975. 15 While<br />
hog farms were becoming fewer in number <strong>and</strong> more specialized, hog<br />
output increased by 40% between 1975 <strong>and</strong> 1980.<br />
The years between 1980 <strong>and</strong> 1988 saw further declines in farm numbers.<br />
By 1988, only 326,000 U.S. farms had hogs. While hog farm numbers<br />
were declining, the total number of hogs produced was increasing due to<br />
larger sow herds, more litters born per sow in a year, <strong>and</strong> more pigs<br />
produced per litter on larger farms. Since 1992, hog farm numbers have<br />
increased only in the size category of 2,000 hogs or more. 16 By 1999,<br />
there were 98,460 U.S. farm selling hogs.<br />
Figures 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 show changes in the annual U.S. pig crop <strong>and</strong> in the<br />
number of U.S. farms with hogs between 1983 <strong>and</strong> 1999.<br />
Figure 1. U.S. Annual Pig Crop 1983-1999. (Source: U.S. Department of<br />
<strong>Agriculture</strong>, National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS)).<br />
http://www.iatp.org/hogreport/sec1.html (3 of 23)2/27/2006 3:50:02 AM