20.12.2013 Views

IATP Hog Report - Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy

IATP Hog Report - Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy

IATP Hog Report - Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Section 6<br />

with respect <strong>and</strong> patience. Now we are looking at a pork<br />

industry in this country that looks at their pigs in terms of<br />

how much money they will generate first <strong>and</strong> the pigs' wellbeing<br />

second. I see an industry that is quickly alienating its<br />

customers <strong>and</strong> is starting to worry about the quality of its<br />

product too late. 102<br />

Why Farm Animal Welfare is Today an Urgent Issue<br />

Over the past 10 years, with little local opposition, factory farm owners<br />

<strong>and</strong> supporters have fought <strong>for</strong> <strong>and</strong> won major revisions in state<br />

anticruelty laws, arguing that their cruel practices are st<strong>and</strong>ard in the<br />

industry. In some states, farm animals have been the losers in political<br />

tradeoffs between state humane societies (not affiliated with the H.S.U.S.),<br />

that want stronger penalties <strong>for</strong> cruelty to pets, <strong>and</strong> agribusiness interests,<br />

that want to weaken cruelty statutes <strong>for</strong> farm animals. In place in 30 states<br />

(as of 1999) are laws exempting farm animals from those states' anticruelty<br />

statutes. 103 Twenty-five states prohibit the application of their anticruelty<br />

statute to all accepted, common, customary, or normal farming<br />

practices. Idaho's amended statute states that when these practices are<br />

applied to farm animals, "they are not construed to be cruel nor shall they<br />

be defined as cruelty to animals, nor shall any person engaged in the<br />

practices, procedures, or activities be charged with cruelty." 104<br />

In revising state animal cruelty laws, state legislatures have h<strong>and</strong>ed the<br />

agribusiness community "the power to decide <strong>for</strong> itself what constitutes<br />

cruelty to animals." 105 This argument was rejected by Mr. Justice Bell in<br />

the "McLibel" verdict: 106<br />

[the argument was presented that] any practice which<br />

accorded with the norm in modern farming or slaughter<br />

practices was thereby acceptable <strong>and</strong> not to be criticized<br />

as cruel. I cannot accept this approach. To do so would be<br />

to h<strong>and</strong> the decision as to what is cruel to the food industry<br />

completely, moved as it must be by economic as well as<br />

animal welfare considerations.<br />

In a number of states only veterinarians or agricultural extension agents<br />

are allowed to make a determination of cruelty with respect to a farming<br />

practice, while state humane societies retain jurisdiction over acts<br />

committed against non-farm animals. The animal agriculture industry thus<br />

not only controls the definition of what is cruelty to farm animals, but,<br />

"effectively build[s] a barricade to prevent anyone but the farming<br />

community discovering what actually occurs on the farm. The role of a<br />

prosecutor or judge is nonexistent." 107<br />

http://www.iatp.org/hogreport/sec6.html (17 of 30)2/27/2006 3:50:16 AM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!