IATP Hog Report - Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy

Section 1
77 Thornsbury, S., Kambhampaty, S.M., and Kenyon, D. (Undated).
Economic impact of a swine complex in Southside Virginia. Blacksburg,
VA: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Department of
Agricultural and Applied Economics.
78 Chism, J. and Levins, R. (1994, Spring). Farm spending and local
selling: How do they match up? Minnesota Agricultural Economist, 676,
St. Paul: University of Minnesota Extension Service.
79 Lawrence, J., Otto D., and Meyer, S. (1997, Spring). Purchasing
patterns of hog producers: Implications for rural agribusiness. Journal of
Agribusiness, 15 (1).
80 Thompson, N. & Haskins, L. (Undated). Searching for "sound science."
A critique of three university studies on the economic impacts of largescale
hog operations. Walthill, NE: Center for Rural Affairs.
81 Peterson, W. (1997, January). Are large farms more efficient? St. Paul:
University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
82 Bowers, D. and Hamrick, K. (eds.). (1997, October). Rural conditions
and trends: Socioeconomic conditions, issue 8 (2). Washington, DC:
Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. http://www.
econ.ag.gov/epubs/pdf/rcat/rcat82/index.htm
83 Thompson, N. & Haskins, L. (Undated). Searching for "sound science."
A critique of three university studies on the economic impacts of largescale
hog operations. Walthill, NE: Center for Rural Affairs.
84 U.S. Department of Agriculture. (1998, January). A time to act: A
report of the USDA National Commission on Small Farms.
(Miscellaneous Publication 1545, p. 9.) Washington, DC: U.S. Department
of Agriculture.
85-86 Land Stewardship Project. (1999, April). Killing competition with
captive supplies: A special report on how meatpackers are forcing
independent family hog farmers out of the market through exclusive
contracts. White Bear Lake, MN: Land Stewardship Project
http://www.iatp.org/hogreport/sec1.html (23 of 23)2/27/2006 3:50:02 AM