Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
to happen because impulses are unable to reach the short toe flexors. On<br />
the other hand, active muscular tension in the patient is of course<br />
restricted to intact muscles: even a few discharging extensor hallucis<br />
longus motor units might then cause upward quivering of the great toe.<br />
This could have been the case in patients 6 and 7, who suffered from<br />
polyneuropathy. The flexor hallucis brevis, being more distal, was probably<br />
most involved, and in fact both patients showed scattered extensor hallucis<br />
longus activity, versus even fewer and later potentials of flexor hallucis<br />
brevis in one patient and none at all in the other. This possible mechanism<br />
does not detract from the principle that one need not be aware of the<br />
peripheral lesion to disqualify these upward toe movements if they are<br />
unrelated to the flexion reflex.<br />
8. Pes cavus. This deformity has also acquired some notoriety for producing<br />
false-positive Babinski signs (Mumenthaler, 1976). It is true that the<br />
primary upward position ol the great toe mechanically favours further<br />
dorsiflexion by even the slightest activity of the extensor hallucis longus.<br />
This is the more so because pes cavus is often accompanied or even caused<br />
by atrophy of intrinsic foot muscles (Thomas, 1975; the hypothesis of<br />
Collier (1899) that increased tone of the extensor hallucis longus contributed<br />
to the deformity is untenable). But again, when the upward<br />
movement of the great toe is a genuine reflex (patient 10), it signifies<br />
abnormal processing of impulses in the spinal cord, irrespective of<br />
peripheral anatomy.<br />
Lacking Babinski response<br />
Finding an equivocal plantar response in the presence of other pyramidal<br />
signs is almost the reverse situation of finding it as an isolated phenomenon,<br />
and usually it presents fewer problems of clinical management. Close<br />
attention to toe movements in their relation to action of other leg muscles<br />
may also be helpful in this group, as shown above by the comparison of<br />
electromyographic results with clinical data. If a Babinski response is truly<br />
absent there are three possible reasons:<br />
1. ]oint deformity. This is not unusual, especially in the form of hallux<br />
valgus. Figure 11 illustrates occult Babinski signs in a patient who could<br />
not even move his great toes voluntarily because of hallux valgus.<br />
2. Peripheral nerve lesions. Pressure palsy of the lateral popliteal nerve is<br />
(or at least was) a common complication of chronic paraplegia, and<br />
precludes a Babinski sign (Collier, 1899; Marie, 1912; Marie and Thiers,<br />
1913; Guttmann, 1952; Grossiord and Kahn, 1957; Landau and Clare,<br />
1959). The same problem can occur at another level in motor neurone<br />
102