Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
surpnsmg to learn that the results were similar in patients with and<br />
without a Babinski response.<br />
Recording with needle electrodes from the extensor hallucis longus<br />
muscle in patients with a Babinski sign was first applied by Kugelberg<br />
(1948), and subsequently by Landau and Clare (1959). Landau and Clare<br />
made a comprehensive study of the activity in various foot and leg muscles<br />
during mechanical stimulation of the sole. They showed that the extensor<br />
hallucis longus was silent in normal subjects, but that in patients with a<br />
Babinski response this muscle was recruited into the flexion reflex synergy,<br />
at the same threshold as the tibialis anterior and extensor digitorum<br />
longus .<br />
. . . or the extensor hallucis brevis?<br />
The studies confirming the role of the extensor hallucis longus as the<br />
effector of the Babinski response were contradicted by Kugelberg et al.<br />
(1960). They reported reflex activity of this muscle in both normal and<br />
pathological cases, following delivery of electrical stimuli to the plantar<br />
surface (pulse trains of 30-40 ms duration). In contrast, the extensor<br />
hallucis brevis was active in normal subjects only when the toes were<br />
stimulated, and this muscle was never activated by plantar stimulation.<br />
Grimby (1963 a) employed the same technique of stimulation (short<br />
pulse trains, here 20 ms) and recording (needle electrodes) in a further<br />
study of normal subjects. Again, reflex discharges in the extensor hallucis<br />
longus were evoked from various parts of the plantar surface as well as<br />
from the pad of the hallux, but in the extensor hallucis brevis only from<br />
the latter site. It was inferred by Grimby that reflex action in the extensor<br />
hallucis longus had little value as an index of disturbed function, and<br />
subsequent studies (Grimby, 1963 b, 1965 a,b; Grimby et al., 1966) were<br />
based solely upon activity in the extensor hallucis brevis (and its antagonist).<br />
However, the results were complex, and no exact boundary could be<br />
drawn between the electromyographic reflex patterns of patients with and<br />
without a Babinski sign. To relate the electrically evoked discharges to the<br />
toe response after conventional stimulation, the tracings were differentiated<br />
not only into 'flexor' and 'extensor' patterns (Grimby, 1963 a), but also<br />
into early and late parts (Grimby, 1965 a), and into degrees of contrast<br />
between effects of hallux stimulation and of plantar stimulation (Grimby,<br />
1965 b). Changes were not parallel in these respects, and the action of<br />
different supraspinal mechanisms had to be invoked (Grimby, 1963 b,<br />
1965 b).<br />
69