FRIEDMAN, E. D. (1920). On a possible significance of the Babinski and other pathologic reflexes. journal of nervous and mental Disease, 51, 146-149. [30, 48 I FUCHS, (1905). Demonstration. Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 18, 126-127. [101] FUJIKI, A., SHIMIZU, A., YAMADA, Y., YAMAMOTO,]., and KANEKO, Z. (1971). The Babinski reflex during sleep and wakefulness. Electroencephalography and clinical Neurophysiology, 31, 6I0-612. [Ill] FULTON,]. F., and KELLER, A. D. (1932). The sign of Babinski- a stud)! of the et
GOLDSTEIN, K. (19) 1). Dber Zeigen und Greifen. Nervenarzt. 4, 45)-466. \ 38] GOLDSTEIN, K. (19)8). The ronic foot response tO stimulation of the sole: its physiological significance and diagnostic value. Brain, 61, 269-28). \"J81 GOLDSTEIN, K (1941). The sign of Babinski. Journal of nervouJ and mental DiJeaJe, 93,281-296. [48] GOLTZ, F., and GERGENS, E. (1876). Ueber die Verrichtungen des Grosshirns. Pfliiger'J Archiv fUr Physiologie, 13, 1-44. [116] GONDA, V. E. ( 1942). A new tendon stretch reflex - its significance in lesions of the pyramidal tracts. Archives of Neurology and Psychiat1y, 48, 5) 1-5) 7. [ 41] GORDON, A. (1904 a). A new reflex: paradoxic flexor reflex - its diagnostic value. American Medicine. 8, 971. ]40] GORDON, A. (1904 b). Reflexe paradoxa! des flechisseurs. Leurs relations avec le reflexe parellaire et le phenomene de Babinski. Revue neztrologique, 12, 108)-1084. [40] GORDON, A. (1907). The second anatomical proof of the value of the paradoxical reflex. American Journal of medical Science.r, 134, 271-27). [40] GORDON, A. (1911). The diagnostic value of the paradoxic reflex- an additional anatomic proof of irs practical importance. Journal of the American medical AJJociation, 56, 805-807. I 40 l GORDON, A. (1914). A propos of the contralateral Oppenheim and Gordon reflexes. Journal of nervow and mental DiJea.re, til, 164-165. [40] GOWERS, W. R. (1892). A manual of diseases of the nervous sy.rtem. 2nd edn., vol. 1, p. 190. London:]. & A. ChurchilL [19] GRAEFFNER (1906). Einige Studien i.iber Reflexe, besonders an Hemiplegikern. Miinchener rnediziniJche Wochemchrift, 53, 489-491. [ 119 J GRANIT, R., and BURKE, R. E. (197)). The control of movement and posture (conference report). Brain ReJearch_. 53, 1-28. [82, 117J GRIGORESCU, D. (1940). Ein neues pyramidales Zeichen. Spital, 60, 289-316. Abstracted from the Rumanian paper in Zentralb!att fiir die geJamte Nettrologie und PJychiatrie (1941), 98, 667. [41] GRIMBY, L. (196) a). Normal plantar response: integration of flexor and extensor reflex components. Journal of Neurology, Neuromrgery and P.rychiatry, 26, 29-50. [16, 69-70, 79, 80, 81] GRIMBY, L. (196) b). Pathological plantar response: disturbances of the normal integration of flexor and extensor reflex components. Journal of Neurology, NeuroJt.trgery and Psychiatry, 26, 314-)21. [69, 81J GRIMBY, L. (1965 a). Pathological plantar response. Part I. Flexor and extensor components in early and late reflex parts. Journttl of Neurology, Neurosmgery and PJychiatry, 28, 469-475 169. 811 GRIMBY, L. ( 1965 .b). Pathological plantar response. Part II. Loss of significance of stimulus site. Journal of Neztrology, NettroJurgeJ)' and P.rychiatry, 28, 476-481. [69, 81] GRIMBY, L, KUGELBERG, E., and LOFSTROM, B. (19661. The plantar response in narcosis. Neurology, 16, 1)9-144. 169] 165
- Page 1 and 2:
THE PLANTAR REFLEX a historical, cl
- Page 3 and 4:
THE PLANTAR REFLEX A HISTORICAL, CL
- Page 5:
Aan mijn ouders Aan Carien, Maarten
- Page 8 and 9:
TELEOLOGICAL SPECULATIONS - science
- Page 10 and 11:
- EMG result and 'final' neurologic
- Page 13:
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS figure page 1
- Page 16 and 17:
Electromyographic recording from mu
- Page 19 and 20:
The plantar reflex before Babinski
- Page 21 and 22:
viz. those of Striimpell (1899), Op
- Page 23 and 24:
These early reports did not reach m
- Page 25 and 26:
Charcot's concepts about hysteria w
- Page 27 and 28:
TABLE I STUDIES CONFIRMING BABINSKI
- Page 29 and 30:
False positive findings? Babinski's
- Page 31 and 32:
FLEXION AND EXTENSION SYNERGIES The
- Page 33 and 34:
confirmed by Walshe (1914). His is
- Page 35 and 36:
esult in disappearance of the Babin
- Page 37 and 38:
without an ipsilateral upgoing toe
- Page 39 and 40:
RIVAL SIGNS Confusion When Babinski
- Page 41 and 42:
8. Stroking the anterior surface of
- Page 43 and 44:
Contradictory findings THE PLANTAR
- Page 45 and 46:
Bersot 1920,'2! ? X ]l 2 Burr 1921
- Page 47:
curious case of one healthy infant
- Page 50 and 51:
9. Infants under one year of age ge
- Page 53 and 54:
INTRODUCTION Observer error: examin
- Page 55 and 56:
following a suggestion that most re
- Page 57 and 58:
TABLE IV INFORMATION PRECEDING THE
- Page 59 and 60:
TABLE VI RATINGS OF 'INFORMATION' G
- Page 61 and 62:
unm i stakab I y upward possibly up
- Page 63 and 64:
Clinical experience appeared to be
- Page 65:
CHAPTER III BABINSKI SIGN: STIMULUS
- Page 68 and 69:
TABLE VII CLINICAL COMMENTS ON THE
- Page 70 and 71:
Normal plantar response: flexor hal
- Page 72 and 73:
I. rn. extensor hallucis longus 2.
- Page 74 and 75:
TABLE VIII OCCURRENCE OF REFLEX ACT
- Page 76 and 77:
ecruited and even interrupted by EH
- Page 78 and 79:
value (the minimal stimulus intensi
- Page 80 and 81:
FIGURE 8 Relative dimen.riom and we
- Page 82 and 83:
the two separate bursts of electrom
- Page 84 and 85:
5. In general, reflex effects produ
- Page 87 and 88:
INTRODUCTION When is an upgoing toe
- Page 89 and 90:
stimulated side diminishes extensor
- Page 91 and 92:
30 patients with equivocal plantar
- Page 93 and 94:
A FHB EHL E TA EHL c FHB TA _j1mV 5
- Page 95 and 96:
Inexperienced observer An additiona
- Page 97 and 98:
patient 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 sex F M M F F
- Page 99 and 100:
Practical use of the flexion reflex
- Page 101 and 102:
1. Contraction of the tibialis ante
- Page 103 and 104:
FHB I ! ¥ _j 02 FHB ...,. r~~a..,.
- Page 105 and 106:
Finally the method of stimulation.
- Page 107:
CHAPTER V THE BABINSKI SIGN AND THE
- Page 110 and 111:
TABLE XIV THEORIES INVOKING A SUPRA
- Page 112 and 113:
change of the plantar reflex was of
- Page 114 and 115: An upgoing toe response in lower pr
- Page 116 and 117: noticed no special features, and of
- Page 118 and 119: 'pyramidal syndrome' were not. Thei
- Page 120 and 121: movements, but also the capacity to
- Page 122 and 123: - rapid foot tapping on the couch,
- Page 124 and 125: TABLE XVI FREQUENCY OF V ARlO US SI
- Page 126 and 127: ~ N 0\ TABLE XVIII PATIENTS WITH A
- Page 128 and 129: ~ N 00 TABLE XIX LACK OF CORRELATIO
- Page 130 and 131: ~ '->' 0 TABLE XX PATIENTS SHOWING
- Page 132 and 133: 3. BABINSKI SIGNS APPEARING IN OR D
- Page 134 and 135: --------------~~- ~ '-" TARLE XXI "
- Page 136 and 137: DISCUSSION Two principal features e
- Page 138 and 139: patients in the first group in whom
- Page 140 and 141: The most striking examples of Babin
- Page 142 and 143: eflex arc must have its impact at o
- Page 144 and 145: hallucis longus motoneurones to seg
- Page 146 and 147: 9. The paradoxical downward toe res
- Page 148 and 149: showed very little agreement with t
- Page 150 and 151: A second condition to be fulfilled
- Page 152 and 153: eide met dubieuze voetzoolreflexen,
- Page 154 and 155: waarin de Babinski-reflex verdween,
- Page 156 and 157: BABINSKI,]. (1885). Recherches sur
- Page 158 and 159: approche d'une interpretation du si
- Page 160 and 161: BUCK, D. de, and MOOR, L. de (1900)
- Page 162 and 163: DEJERINE, ]., and LEVY V j\LENSI, J
- Page 166 and 167: GROSS, F. (1971). The Emperor"s clo
- Page 168 and 169: IIDA, M., and BASMAJIAN,]. V. (1974
- Page 170 and 171: LANDAU, W. M., and CLARE, M. H. (19
- Page 172 and 173: MANFREDI, M., SACCO, G., and SIDER!
- Page 174 and 175: NYBERG-HANSEN, R., and RINVIK, E. (
- Page 176 and 177: lombo-sacrCe avec amyotrophie globa
- Page 178 and 179: STRDMPELL, A. VON (1887). Ueber ein
- Page 180 and 181: WALSHE, F. M. R. (1956). The Babins
- Page 183 and 184: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am grateful for
- Page 185: CURRICULUM VITAE De schrijver van d