27.12.2013 Views

The influence of the place-value structure of the Arabic number ...

The influence of the place-value structure of the Arabic number ...

The influence of the place-value structure of the Arabic number ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

As <strong>the</strong> current manuscript focuses on addition as an indicator <strong>of</strong> arithmetic abilities <strong>the</strong><br />

Austrian curriculum concerning addition and its counterpart subtraction, which are introduced<br />

simultaneously, shall be described briefly. In Austria children should master <strong>number</strong>s up to 20<br />

as well as additions and subtractions within this range by <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> grade one. At <strong>the</strong><br />

beginning <strong>of</strong> grade two <strong>the</strong> to-be-mastered <strong>number</strong> range is extended to 100 and after a recap<br />

<strong>of</strong> single-digit addition and subtraction mental addition and subtraction <strong>of</strong> two-digit <strong>number</strong>s<br />

is introduced. Finally, in grade three <strong>the</strong> written procedures for two-digit addition and<br />

subtraction are dealt with.<br />

Tasks, stimuli and procedure:<br />

First grade assessment: In first grade, children were administered a transcoding task<br />

as well as a <strong>number</strong> magnitude comparison task, amongst o<strong>the</strong>rs; lasting about 10 to 15<br />

minutes each. Additionally, general cognitive measures such as intelligence (CFT-1, Cattell,<br />

Weiß, & Osterland, 1997) and WM capacity (paradigms to be described below) were<br />

assessed. For all numerical tasks employed in <strong>the</strong> current study Spearman-Brown corrected<br />

split-half reliability was computed in an item analysis on error rates.<br />

(i) In <strong>the</strong> Transcoding task children were asked to write down 64 <strong>number</strong>s to dictation.<br />

<strong>The</strong> item set consisted <strong>of</strong> 4 one-digit <strong>number</strong>s (e.g., 4), 20 two-digit <strong>number</strong>s (e.g., 15, 78),<br />

and 40 three-digit <strong>number</strong>s (e.g., 281, 306; for a detailed description <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> stimuli please refer<br />

to Zuber et al., 2009). Errors were coded according to <strong>the</strong> five disjoint subgroups <strong>of</strong><br />

transcoding errors as introduced by Zuber et al. (2009): (i) lexical errors (substitution <strong>of</strong><br />

lexical primitives, e.g., 71 81), syntactic errors such as (ii) pure inversion errors (e.g., 71<br />

17), (iii) additive composition errors (e.g., 171 10071), (iv) multiplicative composition<br />

errors (e.g., 571 5171) and (v) combination errors (e.g., combination <strong>of</strong> additive<br />

composition and inversion: 571 50017). In its current version a split-half reliability <strong>of</strong> r tt =<br />

.95 was obtained for <strong>the</strong> transcoding task.<br />

140

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!