27.12.2013 Views

The influence of the place-value structure of the Arabic number ...

The influence of the place-value structure of the Arabic number ...

The influence of the place-value structure of the Arabic number ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Follow-up assessment: Two years later (i.e., in third grade) children’s calculation<br />

ability was assessed by an addition task. <strong>The</strong> addition task comprised 48 two-digit addition<br />

problems <strong>of</strong> which 24 required a carry operation, lasting approximately 10 to 15 minutes. In<br />

<strong>the</strong> applied choice reaction version children had to indicate which one <strong>of</strong> two proposed<br />

solution probes was correct. Incorrect probes deviated from <strong>the</strong> correct result by ei<strong>the</strong>r ±2 or<br />

±10 to prevent parity based solution strategies. Additionally, average split <strong>of</strong> incorrect<br />

solution probes was zero for both carry and no-carry problems and problem size was matched<br />

between <strong>the</strong> item categories. Problems were presented in <strong>the</strong> form xx + xx at <strong>the</strong> x-/ycoordinates<br />

(0/-120) while <strong>the</strong> two probes appeared at (-250/120) and (250/120) with screen<br />

resolution set to 1024 x 768. Both, addition problems as well as solution probes were<br />

presented simultaneously in white against a black background (font: Arial; size: 60) until one<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two corresponding response buttons was pressed: when <strong>the</strong> left probe was correct <strong>the</strong><br />

Alt button <strong>of</strong> a standard keyboard had to be pressed whereas <strong>the</strong> Alt Gr button had to be<br />

pressed when <strong>the</strong> right probe was correct. No feedback was given as to <strong>the</strong> correctness <strong>of</strong><br />

children’s responses. After one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> response buttons had been pressed and <strong>the</strong> next item<br />

was presented following an inter-stimulus interval was 560 ms. Prior to <strong>the</strong> 48 critical trials<br />

each child completed 10 practice trials to familiarize with display layout and task<br />

requirements. For <strong>the</strong> addition task a split-half reliability <strong>of</strong> r tt = .91 was observed.<br />

Analysis: Performance in all numerical tasks incorporated in <strong>the</strong> analyses was<br />

measured in terms <strong>of</strong> error rates. As error rates cannot be assumed to be normally distributed<br />

error rates were arcsine transformed [i.e., 2*arcsine(sqrt(error rate))] to approximate normal<br />

distribution. Error rates instead <strong>of</strong> reaction times were chosen due to two main arguments:<br />

First, reaction times obtained from children <strong>of</strong>ten show extreme intra- as well as inter-subject<br />

variance that could drive effects in one or ano<strong>the</strong>r direction. Against <strong>the</strong> background <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

142

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!