27.12.2013 Views

The influence of the place-value structure of the Arabic number ...

The influence of the place-value structure of the Arabic number ...

The influence of the place-value structure of the Arabic number ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

data again indicated that decomposed representations <strong>of</strong> tens and units are necessary to<br />

account for <strong>the</strong> compatibility effect, even though <strong>the</strong>y did not seem to preclude <strong>the</strong> existence<br />

<strong>of</strong> a concomitant representation <strong>of</strong> overall magnitude.<br />

Contrasting <strong>the</strong> correlations with empirical data<br />

Finally, to directly compare <strong>the</strong> individual correlation coefficients reflecting <strong>the</strong><br />

interrelation between modelled and empirical data <strong>the</strong>se correlation coefficients were<br />

transformed into Fisher’s Z-<strong>value</strong>s. Contrasting <strong>the</strong> Z-<strong>value</strong>s showed that <strong>the</strong> data produced<br />

by <strong>the</strong> decomposed (Z decomposed = .89) exhibited a descriptively better fit to <strong>the</strong> empirical data<br />

than <strong>the</strong> holistic or <strong>the</strong> hybrid model which was however not statistically reliable (Z holistic =<br />

.78; Z hybrid = .74; difference in z-scores: Z decomposed vs. Z holistic = 1.22; Z decomposed vs. Z yhbrid =<br />

1.59; critical difference at <strong>the</strong> .05 significance level = ±1.96). <strong>The</strong> difference between <strong>the</strong><br />

model fit <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> holistic and <strong>the</strong> hybrid model was also not statistically reliable (difference in<br />

Z-scores = 0.37).<br />

In summary, <strong>the</strong> current computational results for comparisons to a variable standard<br />

indicated that (i) all three models were able to simulate <strong>the</strong> distance effect, (ii) <strong>the</strong><br />

compatibility effect cannot be accounted for by a holistic representation <strong>of</strong> <strong>number</strong><br />

magnitude, (iii) <strong>the</strong> inclusion <strong>of</strong> a predictor reflecting a measure <strong>of</strong> overall difference such as<br />

<strong>the</strong> difference <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> logarithms <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> to-be-compared <strong>number</strong>s was not necessarily<br />

determined by <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> a holistic representation ei<strong>the</strong>r and (iv) <strong>the</strong> more complex<br />

hybrid model did not perform better than <strong>the</strong> more parsimonious strictly decomposed model.<br />

258

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!