27.12.2013 Views

The influence of the place-value structure of the Arabic number ...

The influence of the place-value structure of the Arabic number ...

The influence of the place-value structure of the Arabic number ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

.09]. Taken toge<strong>the</strong>r, analyzing <strong>the</strong> data produced by <strong>the</strong> strictly decomposed model provided<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r evidence for <strong>the</strong> validity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> notion <strong>of</strong> decomposed processing.<br />

Hybrid model<br />

ANOVA<br />

Generally, <strong>the</strong> results for <strong>the</strong> data produced by <strong>the</strong> hybrid model were quite similar to<br />

those observed for <strong>the</strong> data <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> strictly decomposed model. Predicting <strong>the</strong> empirical RTs on<br />

<strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> modelled RT data resulted in a R 2 <strong>of</strong> .40 [r = .63; F(12, 238) = 159.29, p <<br />

.001]. Moreover, <strong>the</strong> ANOVA over items showed a significant main effect <strong>of</strong> compatibility<br />

indicating estimated RTs for compatible <strong>number</strong> pairs to be reliably faster than RTs for<br />

incompatible <strong>number</strong> pairs [734 ms vs. 754 ms, respectively; F(1, 232) = 26.70, p < .001, see<br />

Figure 2, Panel D]. Additionally, <strong>the</strong> expected interaction <strong>of</strong> compatibility and unit distance<br />

was present in <strong>the</strong> data [F(1, 232) = 11.65, p < .01]. So, <strong>the</strong> compatibility effect was larger for<br />

<strong>number</strong> pairs with a large unit distance than for <strong>number</strong> pairs with a small unit distance (34<br />

ms vs. 7 ms, respectively). Again, <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> remaining contrasts and interactions only <strong>the</strong> main<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> decade distance [F(1, 232) = 322.74, p < .001] was significant despite <strong>the</strong> marginally<br />

significant interaction <strong>of</strong> compatibility and decade distance [F(1, 232) = 3.39, p = .07; all<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r F < 1]. This indicated that <strong>number</strong> pairs with a large decade distance were followed by<br />

shorter RTs as compared to <strong>number</strong> pairs with a small decade distance (708 ms vs. 779 ms,<br />

respectively). Additionally, <strong>the</strong> compatibility effect tended to be stronger for <strong>number</strong> pairs<br />

with a large decade distance than for pairs with a small decade distance (26 ms vs. 13 ms,<br />

respectively). .<br />

Regression<br />

For <strong>the</strong> RT estimates produced by <strong>the</strong> hybrid model <strong>the</strong> stepwise multiple regression<br />

analysis yielded an adjusted R 2 <strong>of</strong> .76 [R = .87, F(6, 234) = 149.79, p < .001]. <strong>The</strong> final model<br />

incorporated <strong>the</strong> following five predictors: <strong>the</strong> difference <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> logarithms <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two to-be-<br />

256

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!