27.12.2013 Views

The influence of the place-value structure of the Arabic number ...

The influence of the place-value structure of the Arabic number ...

The influence of the place-value structure of the Arabic number ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

impossible to bisect by an integer should specifically activate regions in prefrontal cortex<br />

which are involved in cognitive set changes. Whereas for triplets possible to bisect increased<br />

activation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> intraparietal cortex would indicate reliance upon magnitude manipulations to<br />

derive <strong>the</strong> correct answer.<br />

METHOD<br />

Participants: Seventeen male right-handed volunteers (mean age=24.2 years, range<br />

21-30 years) took part in <strong>the</strong> study after having given <strong>the</strong>ir written consent in accord with <strong>the</strong><br />

protocol <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> local Ethics Committee <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Medical Faculty.<br />

Experimental task: 360 one- and two-digit <strong>number</strong> triplets including integer <strong>number</strong>s<br />

ranging from 1 to 99 were presented in a 2 x 2 within participant design in <strong>Arabic</strong> notation for<br />

both bisected (e.g. 23_26_29) and non-bisected triplets (e.g. 23_25_29). For bisected triplets,<br />

multiplicativity (<strong>number</strong> triplets part/not part <strong>of</strong> a multiplication table, e.g. 21_24_27 vs.<br />

22_25_28) and bisection range (<strong>the</strong> distance between <strong>the</strong> outer <strong>number</strong>s; small: 4-8, e.g.<br />

23_26_29 vs. large 12-18, e.g. 22_30_38) were varied. For non-bisected triplets, we<br />

manipulated bisection possibility (whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> mean <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> interval is an integer, e.g.<br />

21_24_29, mean = 25, or not e.g. 21_24_28, mean = 24.5) and distance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> second <strong>number</strong><br />

to <strong>the</strong> mean <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> interval (far: 2-8, e.g. 6_7_18 vs. near: 0.5 – 1.5, e.g. 6_11_18).<br />

Problem size, overall magnitude, average parity, parity homogeneity, decade crossing and<br />

inclusion <strong>of</strong> multiples <strong>of</strong> ten were matched between <strong>the</strong> respective stimulus groups. In<br />

addition to <strong>the</strong>se variables, bisection range and size <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> central <strong>number</strong> relative to <strong>the</strong><br />

correct mean (i.e. larger/smaller) were matched for non-bisected triplets.<br />

Procedure: Participants were lying in <strong>the</strong> fMRI scanner while responding to <strong>the</strong><br />

stimuli. <strong>The</strong> stimuli were rear-projected on a screen via a mirror attached to <strong>the</strong> head coil <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> scanner at a distance <strong>of</strong> 12 cm from <strong>the</strong> participants. Participants were instructed to decide<br />

as quickly and accurately as possible whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> interval between <strong>the</strong> two outer <strong>number</strong>s was<br />

180

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!