Full page fax print - India Environment Portal

2. Planning
2.1 Is the site properly identified (NP/WLS) and categorized (in terms of zonation) to achieve the
objectives?
Assessment criteria
Condition Category* (Tick ü) Remarks
Site not identified correctly or categorized. Poor
In the absence of buffer around the park
Site identified correctly but not
limitations are severe but never the less, well
Fair
categorized.
designed , apt zonation provided for. Scope for
Site identified correctly but not
Eco-development activity well defined; possibility
Good ü
systematically categorized.
to excise areas under pressure need be pursued.
Site identified correctly and systematically
categorized with proper zonation plans.
Very good
2.2 Does the site have a comprehensive Management Plan?
Assessment criteria
Condition Category* (Tick ü) Remarks
No relevant Management Plan in place. Poor
Ms Shruti Sharma/ B.Praveen,’s plan is science
Management Plan exist but not
based, comprehensive and seen to have
Fair
comprehensive.
incorporated inputs form different sources .
Site has a comprehensive Management
Plan.
Good ü
Site has a comprehensive, science based
Management Plan prepared through a
participatory process.
Very good
2.3 Is the Management Plan routinely and systematically updated?
Assessment criteria
Condition Category* (Tick ü) Remarks
No process in place for systematic review
System for routine and systematic updating in
Poor
and update of Management Plan.
place.
Management Plan sometimes updated in
adhoc manner.
Fair
Management Plan routinely and
systematically updated.
Good ü
Management Plan routinely,
systematically and scientifically updated
through a participatory process.
Very good
*Score: Poor: 2.5; Fair: 5; Good: 7.5; Very Good: 10
Keoladeo National Park (Rajasthan)
101 |