Full page fax print - India Environment Portal

2.4 Does the site safeguards the threatened biodiversity values?
Assessment criteria
Condition Category* (Tick ü) Remarks
Sites does not safeguard the threatened
The values are well documented in the current
Poor
biodiversity values.
management plan. It adequately safeguards
Sites safeguards a few threatened
matroflora and macrofauna.
Fair
biodiversity values.
Sites safeguards a large number of
threatened biodiversity values.
Good ü
Sites safeguards all threatened
biodiversity values.
Very good
2.5 Are stakeholders given an opportunity to participate in planning?
Assessment criteria
Condition Category* (Tick ü) Remarks
Little, if any opportunity for stakeholder
Except preparation of scientific management
Poor
participation in planning.
plan, the stake holders are involved in other
Stakeholders participate in some planning. Fair
planning process.
Stakeholders participate in most planning
processes.
Good ü
Stakeholders routinely and systematically
participate in all planning processes.
Very good
2.6 Are habitat restoration programmes systematically planned and monitored?
Assessment criteria
Condition Category* (Tick ü) Remarks
Habitat restoration programmes are
The management plan identifies details of areas
Poor
entirely adhoc.
requiring habitat restoration including nature and
Limited planning and monitoring
programmes are in place for habitat
Fair
quantum of restoration monitoring is done by
frequent field visits.
restoration.
Habitat restoration programmes are
generally well planned and monitored.
Good
Habitat restoration programmes are
thoroughly planned and monitored.
Very good ü
2.7 Are reintroduction programmes systematically planned and monitored?
Assessment criteria
Condition Category* (Tick ü) Remarks
Reintroduction programmes are
Spp. to be re-introduced are listed in the
Poor
entirely adhoc.
management plan with indication of source of
Limited planning and monitoring
such animals. Earlier program of re-introduction
was properly monitored.
programmes are in place for
Fair
reintroduction programmes.
Reintroduction programmes are
generally well planned and monitored.
Good
Reintroduction programmes are
thoroughly planned and monitored.
Very good ü
*Score: Poor: 2.5; Fair: 5; Good: 7.5; Very Good: 10
Jaldapara Wildlife Sanctuary (West Bengal)
| 78