Full page fax print - India Environment Portal

2.4 Does the site safeguards the threatened biodiversity values?
Assessment criteria
Condition Category* (Tick ü) Remarks
Sites does not safeguard the threatened
The site is very small and well fenced all around.
Poor
biodiversity values.
The biodiversity is in terms of migratory and
Sites safeguards a few threatened
resident bird species, some mammals, reptiles
Fair ü
biodiversity values.
and amphibians. The tree species are mostly
Sites safeguards a large number of
planted and few natural shrubs, herbs and
Good
threatened biodiversity values.
grasses are coming up. Site being small and
Sites safeguards all threatened
fenced threatened biodiversity values are
Very good
biodiversity values.
safeguarded.
2.5 Are stakeholders given an opportunity to participate in planning?
Assessment criteria
Condition Category* (Tick ü) Remarks
Little, if any opportunity for stakeholder
Stakeholders are mainly visitors, one guide and
Poor ü
participation in planning.
villagers of surrounding villages. There is no
Stakeholders participate in some planning. Fair
opportunity given so far to stakeholders to
Stakeholders participate in mos t planning
participate in planning.
Good
processes.
Stakeholders routinely and systematically
Very good
participate in all planning processes.
2.6 Are habitat restoration programmes systematically planned and monitored?
Assessment criteria
Condition Category* (Tick ü) Remarks
Habitat restoration programmes are
entirely adhoc.
Poor
Limited planning and monitoring
programmes are in place for habitat
restoration.
Fair
Habitat restoration programmes are
generally well planned and monitored.
Habitat restoration programmes are
thoroughly planned and monitored.
Good
Very good
ü
The NP has 50% of habitat as a waterbody. Most
important planning for habitat restoration is to
keep the waterbody alive. With the help of CSS
budget the management has got a permanent
water supply from Gudgaon water supply scheme
due to which the water remains throughout the
season.Other programmes like weed eradication,
moud construction and maintenance is done
regularly.
2.7 Are reintroduction programmes systematically planned and monitored?
Assessment criteria
Condition Category* (Tick ü) Remarks
Reintroduction programmes are entirely
adhoc.
Poor -
Limited planning and monitoring
programmes are in place for reintroduction Fair -
programmes.
There is no such programme in the PA.
Reintroduction programmes are generally
well planned and monitored.
Good -
Reintroduction programmes are thoroughly
planned and monitored.
Very good -
*Score: Poor: 2.5; Fair: 5; Good: 7.5; Very Good: 10
Sultanpur National Park (Haryana)
| 330