Full page fax print - India Environment Portal

2.3 Has the boundary of the site (NP/WLS) been rationalised?
Assessment criteria
Condition Category* (Tick ü) Remarks
Boundary of the site not rationalized and there
exists enclave(/s) of private properties within
the site.
Boundary of the site not rationalized and there
exists enclave(/s) of private properties crisscrossing
the periphery of the site.
Boundary of the site though rationalised, there
are stretches of habitat contiguous to but out
side the PA.
The entire boundary of the site is fully
rationalised.
Poor
Fair
Good
Very good
ü
This is a new question which has been added
in Dr. Mathur’s format.
2.4(2.2) Does the site have a comprehensive Management Plan?
Assessment criteria
Condition Category* (Tick ü) Remarks
No relevant Management Plan in place.
Poor
Management Plan exist but not comprehensive
and does not divide the PA into different
Zones.
Fair ü
Site has a comprehensive Management Plan
including identification of the zones on the
ground.
Site has a comprehensive, science based
Management Plan prepared through a
participatory process.
Good
Very good
This question was 2.2 under Dr. Mathur’s
revised format.
2.5 Has the Management Plan been approved by the competent authorities?
Assessment criteria
Condition Category* (Tick ü) Remarks
The Management Plan not approved by any
This is a new question which has been added
Poor ü
authority.
in Dr. Mathur’s format.
The Management Plan has been reviewed and
Fair
approved by the CWLW.
The Management Plan has been approved by
the State Govt. on recommendation of the Good
CWLW.
The management Plan has been sanctioned by
the state Govt. after its due review by the Very good
CWLW and the WII / outside agency.
*Score: Poor: 2.5; Fair: 5; Good: 7.5; Very Good: 10
Sepahijala Wildlife Sanctuary (Tripura)
| 288