Full page fax print - India Environment Portal

1. Context
1.1 Are the values of the site well documented, assessed and monitored?
Assessment criteria
Condition Category* (Tick ü) Remarks
Values not systematically documented,
Values identified and systematically recorded
Poor
assessed or monitored.
Values generally identified but not
systematically assessed and monitored.
Fair
Most values systematically identified and
assessed and monitored.
Good
All values systematically identified and
assessed and monitored.
Very good ü
1.2 Are the threats to site values well documented and assessed?
Assessment criteria
Condition Category* (Tick ü) Remarks
Threats not systematically documented or
Threats are systematically identified, on all aspects
Poor
assessed.
Threats generally identified but not
systematically assessed.
Fair
Most threats systematically identified and
assessed.
Good
All threats systematically identified and
assessed.
Very good ü
1.3 Is the site free from outside human and biotic interference?
Assessment criteria
Condition Category* (Tick ü) Remarks
The site has extensive human and biotic
The site do not have very high biotic interference ,
Poor
interference.
as the site almost inaccessible from different
The site has some human and biotic
sides. There is international boarder in northern
Fair
interference.
and eastern sides.
The site has little human and biotic
interference.
Good ü
The site has no human and biotic
interference
Very good
*Score: Poor: 2.5; Fair: 5; Good: 7.5; Very Good: 10
Khangchendzonga National Park (Sikkim)
| 112