Full page fax print - India Environment Portal

1. Context
1.1 Are the values of the site well documented, assessed and monitored?
Assessment criteria
Condition Category* (Tick ü) Remarks
Values not systematically documented,
Importance of the area high lighted in the
Poor
assessed or monitored.
management plan ,how ever, value as alternate
Values generally identified but not
home for Lion ,not assessed properly and
Fair
systematically assessed and monitored.
effective monitoring mechanism not in place.
Most values systematically identified and
assessed and monitored.
Good ü
All values systematically identified and
assessed and monitored.
Very good
1.2 Are the threats to site values well documented and assessed?
Assessment criteria
Condition Category* (Tick ü) Remarks
Threats not systematically documented or
Threats recognized in the M.P. but some not
Poor
assessed.
quantified i.e. mining in the vicinity ,pollution due
Threats generally identified but not
to industries, adverse impact of Maldharies on the
Fair ü
systematically assessed.
ecosystem , goat/ sheep grazing etc.
Most threats systematically identified and
assessed.
Good
All threats systematically identified and
assessed.
Very good
1.3 Is the site free from human and biotic interference?
Assessment criteria
Condition Category* (Tick ü) Remarks
The site has extensive human and biotic
There are 62 nesses within the sanctuary having
Poor ü
interference.
human population of over 700 families, twenty
The site has some human and biotic
five villages in the periphery and within zone of
Fair
interference.
influence there are major industries [chapter 11
The site has little human and biotic
Ecological and Socio - Economic study of Barda].
Good
interference.
The site has no human and biotic
Very good
interference.
*Score: Poor: 2.5; Fair: 5; Good: 7.5; Very Good: 10
Barda Wildlife Sanctuary (Gujarat)
| 2