Full page fax print - India Environment Portal

2. Planning
2.1 Is the site properly identified (NP /WLS) and categorized (in terms of Zonation) to achieve the
objectives?
Assessment criteria
Condition Category* (Tick ü) Remarks
Site not identified correctly or categorized. Poor
Site (habitat)identified of various identified
Site identified correctly but not
threatened species, notification for that has been
Fair
categorized.
done.
Site identified correctly but not
systematically categorized.
Good
Site identified correctly systematically
categorized with proper zonation plans.
Very good ü
2.2 Does the site have a comprehensive Management Plan?
Assessment criteria
Condition Category* (Tick ü) Remarks
No relevant Management Plan in place. Poor ü The comprehensive management plan is under
Management Plan exist but not
preparation.
Fair
comprehensive
Non-availability of the Topo sheets of the sensitive
Site has a comprehensive Management
boarder areas is one of the reason ( only 44 out of
Good
Plan
77 available)
Site has a comprehensive, science based
Management Plan prepared through a Very good
participatory process.
2.3 Is the Management Plan routinely and systematically updated?
Assessment criteria
Condition Category* (Tick ü) Remarks
No process in place for systematic review
Does not arise
Poor ü
and update of Management Plan.
Management Plan sometimes updated in
ad-hoc manner.
Fair
Management Plan routinely and
systematically updated.
Good
Management Plan routinely,
systematically and scientifically updated Very good
through a participatory process.
*Score: Poor: 2.5; Fair: 5; Good: 7.5; Very Good: 10
Khangchendzonga National Park (Sikkim)
113 |