Full page fax print - India Environment Portal

2.13(2.9) Has the site been effective in the mitigation of human-wildlife conflicts?
Assessment criteria
Condition Category* (Tick ü) Remarks
Human-wildlife conflicts are rampant.
Poor
This question was 2.9 under Dr. Mathur’s
Site has been able to mitigate few humanwildlife
conflicts.
revised format.
Fair
Site has been able to mitigate many humanwildlife
conflicts.
Good
Site has been able effective in mitigating all
human-wildlife conflicts.
Very good ü
2.14 Is the site properly identified (NP /WLS) and categorized (in terms of Zonation) to achieve the
objectives?
Assessment criteria
Condition Category* (Tick ü) Remarks
Site not identified correctly or categorized. Poor
Site identified correctly but not categorized. Fair
Site identified correctly but not systematically
categorized.
Good
Site identified correctly systematically
categorized with proper zonation plans.
Very good
2.15 Is the site integrated into a wider ecological network following the principles of ecosystem
approach?
Assessment criteria
Condition Category* (Tick ü) Remarks
Site not integrated into a wider network /
This does not appear to be appropriate at site
Poor
landscape.
level and may be taken to state level
Some limited attempts to integrate the site into
assessment.
Fair
a network / landscape.
Site is generally quite well integrated into a
network / landscape
Good
Site is fully integrated into a wider network /
landscape.
Very good
*Score: Poor: 2.5; Fair: 5; Good: 7.5; Very Good: 10
Sepahijala Wildlife Sanctuary (Tripura)
291 |