Full page fax print - India Environment Portal

1. Context
1.1 Are the values of the site well documented, assessed and monitored?
Assessment criteria
Condition Category* (Tick ü) Remarks
Values not systematically documented,
The values of the site has been very well
Poor
assessed or monitored.
documented.
Values generally identified but not
systematically assessed and monitored.
Fair
Most values systematically identified and
assessed and monitored.
Good
All values systematically identified and
assessed and monitored.
Very good ü
1.2 Are the threats to site values well documented and assessed?
Assessment criteria
Condition Category* (Tick ü) Remarks
Threats not systematically documented or
All potential threats are being identified. The
Poor
assessed.
threats cover (a) construction of 600MW power
Threats generally identified but not
house at KIMI (b) ITDC tourist lodge (c) Poaching
Fair
systematically assessed.
pattern (d) NTFR extraction. (e) Ecological threats
Most threats systematically identified and
of the weeds has also been identified
Good
assessed.
All threats systematically identified and
Very good ü
assessed.
1.3 Is the site free from outside human and biotic interference?
Assessment criteria
Condition Category* (Tick ü) Remarks
The site has extensive human and biotic
Human settlement and encroachment has been
Poor
interference
stopped.
The site has some human and biotic
interference
Fair
The site has little human and biotic
interference
Good ü
The site has no human and biotic
interference
Very good
*Score: Poor: 2.5; Fair: 5; Good: 7.5; Very Good: 10
Sessa Orchid Wildlife Sanctuary (Arunachal Pradesh)
| 302