Full page fax print - India Environment Portal

1. Context
1.1 Are the values of the site well documented, assessed and monitored?
Assessment criteria
Condition Category* (Tick ü) Remarks
Values not systematically documented,
The values have been identified in the
Poor
assessed or monitored.
management plan, but not systematically
Values generally identified but not
monitored.
Fair ü
systematically assessed and monitored.
Most values systematically identified and
assessed and monitored.
Good
All values systematically identified and
assessed and monitored.
Very good
1.2 Are the threats to site values well documented and assessed?
Assessment criteria
Condition Category* (Tick ü) Remarks
Threats not systematically documented or
The threats are identified in the management plan
Poor
assessed.
but not systematically asses sed.
Threats generally identified but not
systematically assessed.
Fair ü
Most threats systematically identified and
assessed.
Good
All threats systematically identified and
assessed.
Very good
1.3 Is the site free from human and biotic interference?
Assessment criteria
Condition Category* (Tick ü) Remarks
The site has extensive human and biotic
The site has considerable human of biotic
Poor
interference.
interference especially from included population.
The site has some human and biotic
interference.
Fair ü
The site has little human and biotic
interference.
Good
The site has no human and biotic
interference.
Very good
*Score: Poor: 2.5; Fair: 5; Good: 7.5; Very Good: 10
Sunebeda Wildlife Sanctuary (Orissa)
| 342