Full page fax print - India Environment Portal

2. Planning
2.1 Is the site properly identified (NP/WLS) and categorized (in terms of zonation) to achieve the
objectives?
Assessment criteria
Condition Category* (Tick ü) Remarks
Site not identified correctly or categorized. Poor
Due to inclusion of private lands inside the
Site identified correctly but not
sanctuary boundary there is great difficulty in
Fair ü
categorized.
categorization in terms of zones but still core,
Site identified correctly but not
buffer, tourism, ecorestoration and
Good
systematically categorized.
ecodevelopment zones have been categorized in
Site identified correctly and systematically
the management plan which are difficult to
Very good
categorized with proper zonation plans.
implement.
2.2 Does the site have a comprehensive Management Plan?
Assessment criteria
Condition Category* (Tick ü) Remarks
No relevant Management Plan in place. Poor
The PA has a comprehensive management plan
Management Plan exist but not
for the period 2000-01 to 2009-10. This is the first
Fair
comprehensive.
management plan prepared for the P.A.
Site has a comprehensive Management
Plan.
Good ü
Site has a comprehensive, science based
Management Plan prepared through a
participatory process.
Very good
2.3 Is the Management Plan routinely and systematically updated?
Assessment criteria
Condition Category* (Tick ü) Remarks
No process in place for systematic review
This is the first management plan of the PA which
Poor
and update of Management Plan.
needs up dating and systematization based on
Management Plan sometimes updated in
recent surveys, studies and experiences gained.
Fair ü
adhoc manner.
Management Plan routinely and
Good
systematically updated.
Management Plan routinely,
systematically and scientifically updated Very good
through a participatory process.
2.4 Does the site safeguards the threatened biodiversity values?
Assessment criteria
Condition Category* (Tick ü) Remarks
Sites does not safeguard the threatened
Because of the remoteness of the site, fear of
Poor
biodiversity values.
outlaws living perpetually in the ravines & low
Sites safeguards a few threatened
consumption level of local people and
Fair ü
biodiversity values.
compatible way of life,the biodiversity values of
Sites safeguards a large number of
the site are still safeguarded in spite of heavy
Good
threatened biodiversity values.
biotic pressure.
Sites safeguards all threatened
Very good
biodiversity values.
*Score: Poor: 2.5; Fair: 5; Good: 7.5; Very Good: 10
National Chambal Wildlife Sanctuary (UP)
215 |