Full page fax print - India Environment Portal

2.4 Does the site safeguards the threatened biodiversity values?
Assessment criteria
Condition Category* (Tick ü) Remarks
Sites does not safeguard the threatened
Floral resources of the sanctuary have improved
Poor
biodiversity values.
a lot along with some keystone animal spp.
Sites safeguards a few threatened
biodiversity values.
Fair
Sites safeguards a large number of
threatened biodiversity values.
Good ü
Sites safeguards all threatened
biodiversity values.
Very good
2.5 Are stakeholders given an opportunity to participate in planning?
Assessment criteria
Condition Category* (Tick ü) Remarks
Little, if any opportunity for stakeholder
Most of the participation of the stakeholders are
Poor
participation in planning.
restricted to E.D.C works and some support to
Stakeholders participate in some planning. Fair ü protection duties.
Stakeholders participate in most planning
processes.
Good
Stakeholders routinely and systematically
participate in all planning processes.
Very good
2.6 Are habitat restoration programmes systematically planned and monitored?
Assessment criteria
Condition Category* (Tick ü) Remarks
Habitat restoration programmes are
Habitat restoration works are being carried out on
Poor
entirely adhoc.
short term basis, monitoring works are also
Limited planning and monitoring
limited in time frame.
programmes are in place for habitat
Fair ü
restoration.
Habitat restoration programmes are
generally well planned and monitored.
Good
Habitat restoration programmes are
thoroughly planned and monitored.
Very good
*Score: Poor: 2.5; Fair: 5; Good: 7.5; Very Good: 10
Mahananda Wildlife Sanctuary (West Bengal)
| 164