Full page fax print - India Environment Portal

1.4 Is there any human settlement within the PA?
Assessment criteria
Condition Category* (Tick ü) Remarks
The site has extensive human settlement with
increasing human and cattle population
causing deterioration to biodiversity.
The site has a stable human and cattle
population.
The site has human settlement within the PA
but the same are under the process of
relocation outside the PA.
The site has no human and cattle settlement
within the PA.
Poor
Fair
Good
Very good
1.5(1.3) Is the site free from outside human and biotic interference?
Assessment criteria
ü
This is a new question which has been added
in Dr. Mathur’s format.
Condition Category* (Tick ü) Remarks
The site has extensive human and biotic
This question was 1.3 under Dr. Mathur’s
Poor
interference from outside the PA.
revised format.
The site has some human and biotic
interference from outside the PA.
Fair ü
The site has little human and biotic interference
from outside the PA.
Good
The site has no human and biotic interference
from outside the PA.
Very good
2. Planning
2.1 Has the external boundary of the site (NP/WLS) been precisely described and notified?
Assessment criteria
Condition Category* (Tick ü) Remarks
Boundary of the site not described precisely. Poor ü This is a new question which has been added
Boundary not described but the extant of PA
described with help of plot numbers of the Fair
in Dr. Mathur’s format.
village cadastral map.
Boundary described with help of prismatic
compass bearings and inter pillar distances.
Good
Boundary described by latitude and longitude
of points of deviations of the boundary.
Very good
2.2 Has the Boundary of the PA been properly demarcated on the ground?
Assessment criteria
Condition Category* (Tick ü) Remarks
Boundary of the site not demarcated precisely
This is a new question which has been added
Poor ü
and distinctly on the ground.
in Dr. Mathur’s format.
Boundary of the site demarcated with help of
temporary pillars/mounds.
Fair
Boundary of the site demarcated with help of
permanent pillars.
Good
The entire boundary of the site fenced
permanently.
Very good
*Score: Poor: 2.5; Fair: 5; Good: 7.5; Very Good: 10
Sepahijala Wildlife Sanctuary (Tripura)
287 |