Full page fax print - India Environment Portal

3.4 What level of resources is provided by NGOs?
Assessment criteria
Condition Category* (Tick ü) Remarks
NGOs contribute nothing for the
There are various local, national and
Poor
management of the site.
international NGOs supporting various
NGOs make some contribution to
programmes in these PAs and SAHARA a local
management of the site but opportunities
NGO is most popular among local people.
Fair
for collaboration are not systematically
explored.
NGOs contributions are systematically
sought and negotiated for the
Good ü
management of some site level activities.
NGOs contributions are systematically
sought and negotiated for the
management of many site level activities.
Very good
3.5 Does PA manager considers resources (human and financial) to be sufficient?
Assessment criteria
Condition Category* (Tick ü) Remarks
Resources insufficient for most tasks. Poor
Because of River Valley Project money being
Resources sufficient for some tasks.
Fair
made available to this cluster there should be no
Resources sufficient for most tasks. Good ü difficulty of funds provided that it is usefully
Resources are in excess for most tasks. Very good
utilized.
4. Process
4.1 Does the site have trained manpower resources for effective PA management?
Assessment criteria
Condition Category* (Tick ü) Remarks
Very few trained officers and frontline staff
The FD and Dy. Director are diploma course
Poor
in the site.
trained from WII and one Forest Ranger is
Few trained officers and frontline staff,
certificate course trained from WII. 2 Forest
Fair
who are posted in the site.
Guards are trained in wildlife training course run
A large number of trained officers and
by State Govt. There is good exposure of field
Good ü
frontline staff are posted in the site.
staff due to World Bank aided COB Project
All trained managers and frontline staff
(1994-99).
posted in the site.
Very good
*Score: Poor: 2.5; Fair: 5; Good: 7.5; Very Good: 10
Great Himalayan National Park (HP)
| 56