Full page fax print - India Environment Portal

5.3 Are management related trends systematically evaluated and routinely reported?
Assessment criteria
Condition Category* (Tick ü) Remarks
Little or no systematic evaluation or routine
The management trends are not being
Poor ü
reporting of management related trends.
systematically evaluated. This is the first
Some evaluation and reporting undertaken
evaluation of its kind done by an external
Fair
but neither systematic nor routine.
agency based on IUCN guidelines.
Systematic evaluation and routine reporting
Good
of management related trends undertaken.
Systematic evaluation and comprehensive
reporting of management related trends Very good
undertaken.
5.4 Is there a systematic maintenance schedule and funds in place for management of infrastructure/assets?
Assessment criteria
Condition Category* (Tick ü) Remarks
No systematic inventory or maintenance
The maintenance schedule as per
Poor
schedule.
departmental practice for infrastructure/assets
Inventory maintenance is adhoc and so is
exists but funds are not adequate for their
Fair ü
the maintenance schedule.
maintenance specially for maintenance and
Systematic inventory provides the basis for
upkeep of staff quarters, bridges and culverts,
maintenance schedule but funds are
Good
fire arms, wireless sets and Forest Rest
inadequately made available.
Houses.
Systematic inventory provides the basis for
maintenance schedule and adequate funds
are made available.
6. Outcomes
Very good
6.1 Are threatened/ endangered species populations stable or increasing?
Assessment criteria
Condition Category* (Tick ü) Remarks
Threatened/ endangered species
populations declining.
Some threatened/ endangered species
populations increasing, most others stable.
Most threatened/ endangered species
populations increasing, most others stable.
All threatened/ endangered species
populations either increasing or stable.
*Score: Poor: 2.5; Fair: 5; Good: 7.5; Very Good: 10
Poor
Fair
Good
Very good
ü
The estimation figures maintained by the
management show a declining trend for tiger
population and that is evident from the
decline shown in the important ungulate
population (Cheetal, Sambar & Nilgai).
Panther population shows an increase and
that is evident from the signs found by me on
the ground. This is another indication of
decrease in tiger population. During my field
visit of two days I could see pug marks of
one large female in Bankatwa range close to
Pipraha FRH near Hathiyakund Nala and
pugmarks of a male tiger in Mendhkiya beat
of same Range behind Banghogwa bund.
The habitat is good and has potential for
good tiger population provided the biotic
pressures are reduced.
Sohelwa Wildlife Sanctuary (Uttar Pradesh)
323 |