Full page fax print - India Environment Portal

6. Outcomes
6.1 Are threatened/ endangered species populations stable or increasing?
Assessment criteria
Condition Category* (Tick ü) Remarks
Threatened/ endangered species
populations declining.
Poor
Some threatened/ endangered species
populations increasing, most others stable.
Fair ü
Most threatened/ endangered species
populations increasing, most others stable.
Good
All threatened/ endangered species
populations either increasing or stable.
Very good
6.2 Are biological communities at a mix of ages and spacing that will support native biodiversity?
Assessment criteria
Condition Category* (Tick ü) Remarks
Biological communities unlikely to be able
to sustain native biodiversity.
Poor
Some biological communities likely to be
able to sustain native biodiversity.
Fair ü
Most biological communities likely to be
able to sustain native biodiversity.
Good
All biological communities likely to be able
to sustain native biodiversity.
Very good
6.3 Have the threats to the site being abated/ minimized?
Assessment criteria
Condition Category* (Tick ü) Remarks
Threats to the site have not abated but
have enhanced.
Poor
Some threats to the site have been abated. Fair ü
Most threats to the site have been abated. Good
All threats to the site have been abated. Very good
6.4 Are the expectations of visitors generally met or exceeded?
Assessment criteria
Condition Category* (Tick ü) Remarks
Expectations of visitors generally not met. Poor ü There is neither sighing of animals nor
Expectations of many visitors are met.
Fair
appropriate facilities forland / river based
Expectations of most visitors are met.
Good
nature tourism.
Good expectations of most visitors are met. Very good
*Score: Poor: 2.5; Fair: 5; Good: 7.5; Very Good: 10
Papikonda Wildlife Sanctuary (Andhra Pradesh)
| 258