28.01.2014 Views

Full page fax print - India Environment Portal

Full page fax print - India Environment Portal

Full page fax print - India Environment Portal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2. Planning<br />

2.1 Is the site properly identified (NP /WLS) and categorized (in terms of Zonation) to achieve the<br />

objectives?<br />

Assessment criteria<br />

Condition Category* (Tick ü) Remarks<br />

Site not identified correctly or categorized. Poor<br />

The categorisation and zonation has been done<br />

Site identified correctly but not<br />

but specific identification at the site has not yet<br />

Fair<br />

categorized.<br />

happed. Broadly area is known to the<br />

Site identified correctly but not<br />

department.<br />

Good ü<br />

systematically categorized.<br />

Site identified correctly systematically<br />

categorized with proper zonation plans.<br />

Very good<br />

2.2 Does the site have a comprehensive Management Plan?<br />

Assessment criteria<br />

Condition Category* (Tick ü) Remarks<br />

No relevant Management Plan in place. Poor<br />

The site has a draft management plan. That is<br />

Management Plan exist but not<br />

yet to be approved by higher authorities. Period<br />

Fair<br />

comprehensive<br />

2005-2009<br />

Site has a comprehensive Management<br />

Plan<br />

Good ü<br />

Site has a comprehensive, science based<br />

Management Plan prepared through a<br />

participatory process.<br />

Very good<br />

2.3 Is the Management Plan routinely and systematically updated?<br />

Assessment criteria<br />

Condition Category* (Tick ü) Remarks<br />

No process in place for systematic review<br />

Yet to be done, but is modified as per<br />

Poor<br />

and update of Management Plan.<br />

requirement<br />

Management Plan sometimes updated in<br />

ad-hoc manner.<br />

Fair ü<br />

Management Plan routinely and<br />

systematically updated.<br />

Good<br />

Management Plan routinely,<br />

systematically and scientifically updated<br />

through a participatory process.<br />

Very good<br />

2.4 Does the site safeguard the threatened biodiversity values?<br />

Assessment criteria<br />

Condition Category* (Tick ü) Remarks<br />

Sites does not safeguard the threatened<br />

biodiversity values.<br />

Poor<br />

Sites safeguards a few threatened<br />

biodiversity values.<br />

Fair<br />

Sites safeguards a large number of<br />

threatened biodiversity values.<br />

Good<br />

Sites safeguards all threatened<br />

biodiversity values.<br />

Very good ü<br />

*Score: Poor: 2.5; Fair: 5; Good: 7.5; Very Good: 10<br />

Sessa Orchid Wildlife Sanctuary (Arunachal Pradesh)<br />

303 |

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!