Full page fax print - India Environment Portal

2.9 Has the site been effective in the mitigation of human-wildlife conflicts?
Assessment criteria
Condition Category* (Tick ü) Remarks
Human-wildlife conflicts are rampant. Poor
There is no major human wildlife conflict. Some
Site has been able to mitigate few humanwildlife
conflicts.
also not aware of the necessity and procedure of
incident may not be reported also. Villagers are
Fair
Site has been able to mitigate many
reporting.
Good ü
human-wildlife conflicts.
Site has been able effective in mitigating
all human-wildlife conflicts.
Very good
2.10 Is the site integrated into a wider ecological network following the principles of ecosystem
approach?
Assessment criteria
Condition Category* (Tick ü) Remarks
Site not integrated into a wider network /
Sessa Orchid Sanctuary and Eagle nest WLS
Poor
landscape.
falls within the same landscape and broad
Some limited attempts to integrate the site
ecological unit. There are no other specific
Fair
into a network / landscape.
activities required to homogenous and for
Site is generally quite well integrated into a
ecological integration. The declaration of the
Good
network / landscape
nearby areas simultaneously as sanctuaries is a
Site is fully integrated into a wider network
farsighted and laudable exercise.
Very good ü
/ landscape.
3. Inputs
3.1 Are the personnel well organized and managed with access adequate recourses?
Assessment criteria
Condition Category* (Tick ü) Remarks
Few, if any, personnel explicitly allocated
The personals are well organised.
Poor
for PA management
Some personnel explicitly allocated for PA
management but not systematically linked Fair
to management objectives
Some personnel explicitly allocated
towards achievement of specific
Good ü
management objectives.
Adequate personnel explicitly allocated
towards achievement of specific
management objectives.
Very good
*Score: Poor: 2.5; Fair: 5; Good: 7.5; Very Good: 10
Sessa Orchid Wildlife Sanctuary (Arunachal Pradesh)
305 |