02.02.2014 Views

A monograph of the British fossil corals - kreidefossilien.de

A monograph of the British fossil corals - kreidefossilien.de

A monograph of the British fossil corals - kreidefossilien.de

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

48 BRITISH FOSSIL CORALS.<br />

very slightly flexuous, and presenting laterally a few large granulations. Lissephnents<br />

simple, almost horizontal, and few in number ;<br />

about three from <strong>the</strong> top to <strong>the</strong> bottom <strong>of</strong><br />

each principal septum, as may be seen by means <strong>of</strong> a vertical section. Height varying<br />

from one to two inches ; diameter <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> calice, four lines ; <strong>de</strong>pth <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fossula, two lines.<br />

The genus Parasmilia, circumscribed within <strong>the</strong> limits assigned to it<br />

in <strong>the</strong> Introduction<br />

to this Monograph, only contains seven species, all <strong>of</strong> which belong exclusively to <strong>the</strong> upper<br />

beds <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Chalk Formations.<br />

Three <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m (P. centralis, P. Gravesiana, and P. ehngatd)<br />

have already been <strong>de</strong>scribed in our Monograph <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Astreidse,^ and <strong>the</strong> four o<strong>the</strong>rs<br />

(P. MantelUi, P. Fittonii, P. cylindrica, and P. serpentina) will be ma<strong>de</strong> known in <strong>the</strong><br />

present work. They all differ but little from each o<strong>the</strong>r, and in or<strong>de</strong>r to recognise <strong>the</strong>m,<br />

it is necessary that <strong>the</strong>y should be compared toge<strong>the</strong>r \d\\\ attention. P. centralis, which<br />

may be consi<strong>de</strong>red as <strong>the</strong> type <strong>of</strong> this small generic group, differs from P. Gravesiana,<br />

P. elongata, P. cylindrica, and P. MantelUi, by its costse being always straight, ra<strong>the</strong>r<br />

thick and never sub-lamellous, and ra<strong>the</strong>r flexuous, as in <strong>the</strong> four last-mentioned species ;<br />

it<br />

is<br />

also to be remarked, that its costae are ra<strong>the</strong>r more prominent near <strong>the</strong> basis than higher<br />

up, whereas <strong>the</strong> contrary is seen in <strong>the</strong> P. Gravesiana, and that <strong>the</strong> loculi are never<br />

subdivi<strong>de</strong>d by small dissepiments, as is <strong>the</strong> case in P. elongata, P. cylindrica, and<br />

P. MantelUi. P. serpentina, which bears more resemblance to it, is characterised by <strong>the</strong><br />

septa forming only three cycla, and <strong>the</strong> costae being very <strong>de</strong>licate, and ra<strong>the</strong>r indistinct<br />

towards <strong>the</strong> basis. But it is with P. Fittonii that P. centralis is most closely allied ; <strong>the</strong><br />

former, however, is <strong>of</strong> a thicker form, its tertiary costse are more <strong>de</strong>veloped and more<br />

<strong>de</strong>licately granulated, and its columella is much larger, and terminated by a sub-papillose<br />

surface.<br />

The specimens <strong>of</strong> P. centralis which we had <strong>the</strong> opportunity <strong>of</strong> examining were found<br />

in <strong>the</strong> Upper Chalk at Northfleet, near Gravesend, and at Norwich.<br />

Mr. Phillips mentions<br />

<strong>the</strong> existence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> same <strong>fossil</strong> at Dane's Dike;^ and Dr. Mantell has met with it at<br />

Brighton, Lewes/ Steyning, and Heytesbury.* Mr. Graves also allu<strong>de</strong>s to it as being<br />

found in <strong>the</strong> Challc Formation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Parisian basin at Beauvais / but we have much reason<br />

to think that <strong>the</strong> species observed by that geologist is not <strong>the</strong> one here <strong>de</strong>scribed, and must<br />

be referred to our P. Gravesiana. M. Roemer and o<strong>the</strong>r authors equally apply <strong>the</strong> name<br />

<strong>of</strong> C. centralis^ to<br />

a <strong>fossil</strong> found in <strong>the</strong> north-west <strong>of</strong> Germany, but we have not been able<br />

as yet to verify <strong>the</strong> propriety <strong>of</strong> this <strong>de</strong>termination, not having seen any <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> specimens<br />

discovered in that part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Continent.<br />

^ The species <strong>de</strong>scribed in that work un<strong>de</strong>r <strong>the</strong> names <strong>of</strong> Parasmilia pocuhim, P. Faitjasii, and<br />

P. punctata, must now be referred to our genus Coelosmilia, which is characterised by <strong>the</strong> entire absence <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> cohimella.<br />

- Op. cit., parti, p. 119. ^ lUygt^ ^f tj^g Geol. <strong>of</strong> Sussex, p. ICO.<br />

* Geol. Trans., 2d series, vol. iii, p. 204, ^ Geogn. <strong>de</strong> I'Oise, p. 701.<br />

8 Versteinerungen <strong>de</strong>s Nord<strong>de</strong>utschen Krei<strong>de</strong>birges, p. 26.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!