02.02.2014 Views

A monograph of the British fossil corals - kreidefossilien.de

A monograph of the British fossil corals - kreidefossilien.de

A monograph of the British fossil corals - kreidefossilien.de

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ii<br />

BRITISH FOSSIL CORALS.<br />

monly thus blen<strong>de</strong>d toge<strong>the</strong>r. For us <strong>the</strong> word Coral, or Corallum, must be synonymous<br />

with Polypidom,^ and signify <strong>the</strong> hard or ossified parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> body <strong>of</strong> a Polyp.<br />

In treating <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> " Fossil Corals <strong>of</strong> Great Britain," we must, <strong>the</strong>refore, exclu<strong>de</strong> from<br />

our investigation <strong>the</strong> various organic remains which bear a certain resemblance to<br />

Polypidoms, but which do not in reality belong to beings <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> same structm-e, and we<br />

must cu'cumscribe om- researches within <strong>the</strong> boundaries <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> group <strong>of</strong> Zoophytes, which,<br />

in a Natm'al arrangement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Animal Kingdom, is<br />

represented by <strong>the</strong> Class <strong>of</strong> Polypi.^<br />

These Zoophytes are closely allied to Medusae, and in <strong>the</strong> actual state <strong>of</strong> science <strong>the</strong>re is<br />

some uncertainty respecting <strong>the</strong> natural Umits which separate <strong>the</strong>se two groups ; but <strong>the</strong><br />

mo<strong>de</strong> <strong>of</strong> organization common to both is so characteristic, that <strong>the</strong> most superficial<br />

anatomical investigation wiU always enable <strong>the</strong> zoologist to distinguish a Polyp or an<br />

Acaleph from <strong>the</strong> Bryozoa and <strong>the</strong> Spongida3, which, till lately, have been erroneously<br />

consi<strong>de</strong>red as belonging to <strong>the</strong> class <strong>of</strong> Corals. Polypi have a radiate structm'e ; a protractile<br />

mouth, smToun<strong>de</strong>d by non-ciliate tentacula ; a large and well-organized digestive<br />

cavity ; but have no anus. In Spongidse no appearance <strong>of</strong> tentacula or <strong>of</strong> a stomach is<br />

ever met with ; and in Bryozoa an intestinal canal, much resembling that <strong>of</strong> ordinary<br />

MoUusca, is always provi<strong>de</strong>d with two distinct openings, a mouth and an anus, <strong>the</strong> first <strong>of</strong><br />

which is encu-cled by ciliated tentacula. The structm-e <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> digestive organs is, <strong>the</strong>refore,<br />

characteristic in all <strong>the</strong>se animals, and in most instances <strong>the</strong> radiate form <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> tegumentary<br />

system vdll alone suffice to ren<strong>de</strong>r <strong>the</strong> diagnosis <strong>of</strong> Polypi an easy task. But when <strong>the</strong><br />

Polypidom is reduced to its most simple condition, it sometimes bears great resemblance<br />

to <strong>the</strong> calcareous or horny covering <strong>of</strong> certain Bryozoa, or to <strong>the</strong> reticulate skeleton <strong>of</strong> some<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spongidse ; and <strong>the</strong> Polypidom being <strong>the</strong> only part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se animals which is found<br />

in <strong>the</strong> <strong>fossil</strong> state, it is sometimes hard for <strong>the</strong> palaeontologist to <strong>de</strong>ci<strong>de</strong> whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong><br />

organic remains that assume this form are in reality Corals, or whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y do not belong<br />

to one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r above-mentioned Zoological divisions.<br />

Polypidoms may present two very distinct forms.<br />

Some, belonging to aggregate Polypi,<br />

are <strong>de</strong>veloped on <strong>the</strong> basal surface <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se Zoophytes, and constitute a sort <strong>of</strong> stem in <strong>the</strong><br />

'<br />

In translating <strong>the</strong> French expression Polypier by <strong>the</strong> word Polypidom, which has <strong>of</strong> late been adopted<br />

by some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> most eminent English zoopliytologists, we <strong>de</strong>em it<br />

necessary to guard <strong>the</strong> rea<strong>de</strong>r against <strong>the</strong><br />

erroneous i<strong>de</strong>as which <strong>the</strong> etymology <strong>of</strong> that name might lead to. Till <strong>of</strong> late <strong>the</strong> nature <strong>of</strong> Corals was in<br />

general misun<strong>de</strong>rstood ; <strong>the</strong>y were supposed to be produced by a plastic exudation moul<strong>de</strong>d round <strong>the</strong> body<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Polyp, and serving as a dweUing for <strong>the</strong>se singular beings, but not forming a part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir organism.<br />

Such is far from being <strong>the</strong> case ; <strong>the</strong> corallum is a part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> animal, in <strong>the</strong> same way as <strong>the</strong> coating <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

armadillo or <strong>the</strong> shell <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lobster belong to <strong>the</strong> structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se beings. The words " Polypidom,"<br />

Polypier, &c., might <strong>the</strong>refore be objected to, if <strong>the</strong>ir meaning was not generally known, and had not<br />

become in<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir etymology.<br />

- The class <strong>of</strong> Polypi, reduced to its natural limits, corresponds to <strong>the</strong> Anthozoa <strong>of</strong> M. Ehrenberg, and<br />

to <strong>the</strong> sub-class <strong>of</strong> Radiated Zoophytes <strong>of</strong> Mr. Johnston. In <strong>the</strong> excellent work recently published by<br />

Mr. Dana, <strong>the</strong> same group is <strong>de</strong>signated by <strong>the</strong> name <strong>of</strong> Zoophytes, which is usually employed in a much<br />

wi<strong>de</strong>r acceptation, and had long ago been given by Cuvier to <strong>the</strong> great division <strong>of</strong> radiate animals, comprising<br />

Echino<strong>de</strong>rma and Acalephse, as well as Polypi, etc.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!