02.02.2014 Views

A monograph of the British fossil corals - kreidefossilien.de

A monograph of the British fossil corals - kreidefossilien.de

A monograph of the British fossil corals - kreidefossilien.de

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

62 BRITISH FOSSIL CORALS.<br />

C. cylindrica, C.Breda, and C'.Koninckii, have only six large j!?«/«, whereas in C. Bowerhanlcii<br />

<strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se organs amounts to twelve. C. Iccvigata^ differs from <strong>the</strong> above<strong>de</strong>scribed<br />

species, by <strong>the</strong> pali being narrow, and very thick, and C. Beheyana by <strong>the</strong><br />

existence <strong>of</strong> a well-marked epi<strong>the</strong>cal band near <strong>the</strong> calice.<br />

M. Alci<strong>de</strong> d'Orbigny has, in a recent publication," referred to this species as <strong>the</strong> type<br />

<strong>of</strong> his new genus Jmbloci/afhus, which he <strong>de</strong>fines as being Cyatlnna, with a circular calice<br />

and a round columella. He adds that Amblocyathus is a lost genus, and contains three<br />

<strong>fossil</strong> species belonging to <strong>the</strong> Neocomian and Albian^ strata. We must, however, beg<br />

leave to remark, that <strong>the</strong> two above-mentioned characters are met with in almost every<br />

species <strong>of</strong> our Cyathina, and most especially in C. ci/afJius, which is <strong>the</strong> type <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> genus<br />

Cyatlnna, and is actually living in <strong>the</strong> IMediterranean sea. Only two <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> species<br />

referred to <strong>the</strong> genus Cyathina in our ]\Ionograph ' <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Turbinolidse' present a slightly<br />

oval calice and a transversal columella C. 2}seudoturbinoKu and C. Guadulpensis. In<br />

C. SmitJiii <strong>the</strong> columella is oblong, but <strong>the</strong> calice is circular, or nearly so. If it be con.<br />

si<strong>de</strong>red necessary to separate <strong>the</strong> Cyathina with a circular calico from those that have an<br />

oval calice, it would <strong>the</strong>refore be more proper to give a new generic name to <strong>the</strong> latter, and<br />

not to change <strong>the</strong> <strong>de</strong>nomination <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> group containing <strong>the</strong> very species for which<br />

Ehrenberg first established <strong>the</strong> genus Cyathina. But this innovation, proposed by<br />

M. d'Orbigny, appears to us as being in every respect unnecessary, for <strong>the</strong> slight <strong>de</strong>formation<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> calice and <strong>the</strong> columella which forms <strong>the</strong> sole basis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> new generic division, can<br />

hardly be consi<strong>de</strong>red as characters <strong>of</strong> sufficient value; species that differ in no o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

respect are <strong>of</strong>ten found to vary in this way, and even specimens belonging to <strong>the</strong> same<br />

species sometimes differ much in <strong>the</strong> form <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> calicular margin. Thus, although <strong>the</strong><br />

calice is circular, or nearly so, in most specimens <strong>of</strong> C. cyathis and C. Sniif/iii that are met<br />

\nth, we have seen some that were compressed, and had <strong>the</strong> calice as oval as in C. pseudoturhinolia<br />

and C. Guadulpensis ; similar <strong>de</strong>viations from <strong>the</strong> normal form are also to be<br />

met with in <strong>the</strong> columella; in C. SniUJiii, for example, this organ is sometimes quite<br />

circular, although it is in general oblong. Differences <strong>of</strong> this kind, when not more marked<br />

than is <strong>the</strong> case among <strong>the</strong> various species <strong>of</strong> Cyathina, can <strong>the</strong>refore scarcely be <strong>de</strong>emed<br />

important enough to characterise generic divisions ; and, as in <strong>the</strong> present case, <strong>the</strong>y do<br />

not appear to coexist with any o<strong>the</strong>r structural peculiarity, we see no reason for admitting<br />

<strong>the</strong> new genus Amblocyathus.<br />

1 Tab. ix, fig. 1.<br />

2 Note siir <strong>de</strong>s Polypiers Fossiles, Paris, 1849.<br />

^<br />

M. d'Orbigny eniploy.s <strong>the</strong> name oi Albiuti formation to <strong>de</strong>signate <strong>the</strong> Gault.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!