15.02.2014 Views

We aim to be the most preferred non-life insurer in Thailand

We aim to be the most preferred non-life insurer in Thailand

We aim to be the most preferred non-life insurer in Thailand

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Appo<strong>in</strong>tment of <strong>the</strong> Company’s Secretary<br />

The Company’s Board of Direc<strong>to</strong>rs will select a qualified person and appo<strong>in</strong>t him/her as <strong>the</strong> Company’s secretary.<br />

The Board’s meet<strong>in</strong>g (No.3/2008) held on August 14, 2008, passed a resolution appo<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g Mr. Voravit Rojrapitada as <strong>the</strong> Company’s<br />

secretary, effective from August 14, 2008 until now.<br />

1.4 Names of <strong>the</strong> Board of Direc<strong>to</strong>rs and Sub-Committees<br />

The Board of Direc<strong>to</strong>rs (as at Decem<strong>be</strong>r 31, 2009) comprises 11 mem<strong>be</strong>rs as <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g:<br />

1. Executive direc<strong>to</strong>rs consist of 2 mem<strong>be</strong>rs, while ano<strong>the</strong>r direc<strong>to</strong>r is <strong>the</strong> Company’s Adviser.* 1<br />

2. Non-executive direc<strong>to</strong>rs consist of 8 mem<strong>be</strong>rs, all of whom are <strong>in</strong>dependent direc<strong>to</strong>rs, amount<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> more than<br />

one-third of all Board mem<strong>be</strong>rs.* 2<br />

Notes:<br />

*1 On January 1, 2010, Bangkok Insurance Public Company Limited had restructured its organization and altered<br />

<strong>the</strong> position of some of its executive direc<strong>to</strong>rs, caus<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Company’s Board of Direc<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>to</strong> consist of 1 executive direc<strong>to</strong>r and 2<br />

direc<strong>to</strong>rs who are <strong>the</strong> Company’s advisers.<br />

*2 Formerly, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Company’s annual report presentation form and annual report of 2008 (Form 56-1 and 56-2),<br />

two of <strong>the</strong> Company’s Board <strong>non</strong>-executive direc<strong>to</strong>rs, Mr. S<strong>in</strong>gh Tangtaswas and Mr. Suvarn Thansathit, did not have <strong>the</strong> status of<br />

<strong>in</strong>dependent direc<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>be</strong>cause <strong>the</strong>y both were direc<strong>to</strong>rs or executives of a party hav<strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>ess relationship with <strong>the</strong> Company,<br />

which was Bangkok Bank Public Company Limited. In this regard, <strong>the</strong> Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)’s notices<br />

(Tor.Jor.28/2008) item 16 (2) (d) has def<strong>in</strong>ed that <strong>in</strong>dependent direc<strong>to</strong>rs shall not have or did not use <strong>to</strong> have bus<strong>in</strong>ess relationship<br />

with <strong>the</strong> Company. Nei<strong>the</strong>r are <strong>the</strong>y nor used <strong>to</strong> <strong>be</strong> major shareholders, direc<strong>to</strong>rs, who are not <strong>in</strong>dependent, or executive of any<br />

party that has bus<strong>in</strong>ess relationship. (Bus<strong>in</strong>ess relationship means hav<strong>in</strong>g commercial transactions made regularly <strong>to</strong> fulfill bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

transactions through which <strong>the</strong> value ranges from 3 percent of all net tangible assets (NTA) or Baht 20 million per year, depend<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong> which is <strong>the</strong> lesser amount).<br />

Never<strong>the</strong>less, currently, based on SEC’s notices (Tor.Jor. 4/2009), <strong>the</strong>re has <strong>be</strong>en a revision of <strong>in</strong>dependent direc<strong>to</strong>rs’<br />

qualifications, which are def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> item 16 (2) (d) that <strong>in</strong>dependent direc<strong>to</strong>rs shall not have or did not use <strong>to</strong> have bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

relationship with <strong>the</strong> Company. Nei<strong>the</strong>r are <strong>the</strong>y nor used <strong>to</strong> <strong>be</strong> major shareholders (hav<strong>in</strong>g over 10 percent of shares <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Company), nor do <strong>the</strong>y have authority <strong>to</strong> control (mean shareholders or o<strong>the</strong>rs, by circumstances, hav<strong>in</strong>g significant <strong>in</strong>fluence on<br />

<strong>the</strong> Company’s management policy formulation or implementation, whe<strong>the</strong>r or not such <strong>in</strong>fluence is a consequence of <strong>be</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

shareholders or authorized <strong>in</strong> accordance with <strong>the</strong> contract, or o<strong>the</strong>r causes. Nor are <strong>the</strong>y, <strong>in</strong> particular, <strong>the</strong> people <strong>in</strong> one of <strong>the</strong>se<br />

categories. (a) Have over 25 percent of <strong>the</strong> Company’s shares. (B) Have a course of conduct <strong>to</strong> control/remove a Board direc<strong>to</strong>r,<br />

(C) Have a course of conduct <strong>to</strong> control those <strong>in</strong> charge of policy formulation, and (d) Have a course of conduct/responsibility of<br />

implementation comparable <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Company’s management).<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, based on SEC’s revised notices, Mr. S<strong>in</strong>gh Tangtaswas and Mr. Suvarn Thansathit, who are not <strong>the</strong><br />

Company’s major shareholders or have no authority <strong>to</strong> control <strong>in</strong> Bangkok Bank Public Company Limited, are not <strong>in</strong> a condition <strong>to</strong><br />

<strong>be</strong> considered for <strong>the</strong>ir bus<strong>in</strong>ess relationship with <strong>the</strong> Company. Similarly, both direc<strong>to</strong>rs have not had any course of conduct<br />

significantly <strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Company’s management policy formulation or implementation. Nei<strong>the</strong>r are <strong>the</strong>y direc<strong>to</strong>rs authorized <strong>to</strong><br />

b<strong>in</strong>d <strong>the</strong> Company <strong>to</strong> any decision. As a result, both directions have <strong>the</strong> status of <strong>the</strong> Company’s <strong>in</strong>dependent direc<strong>to</strong>rs accord<strong>in</strong>gly.<br />

97

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!