Global Steel Trade; Structural Problems and Future Solutions
Global Steel Trade; Structural Problems and Future Solutions
Global Steel Trade; Structural Problems and Future Solutions
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
among steel-intensive sectors,<br />
such as consumer durables <strong>and</strong><br />
capital goods, declined.<br />
Moreover, as India’s fiscal<br />
deficit grew, the government<br />
drastically reduced spending on<br />
infrastructure <strong>and</strong> other public<br />
projects, further weakening<br />
domestic dem<strong>and</strong> for steel. 144<br />
By FY 1998–1999, apparent<br />
consumption of finished steel<br />
had reached just under 24<br />
million MT 145 (Chart 6-10), 8<br />
million MT shy of the<br />
government’s projections, while<br />
domestic capacity had<br />
increased to more than 32<br />
million MT.<br />
Metric Tons (millions)<br />
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
Finished <strong>Steel</strong> (production)<br />
Total Exports<br />
Total Imports<br />
Apparent domestic consumption<br />
1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999<br />
Source: India Infoline.<br />
6-10. Indian Finished <strong>Steel</strong>, All Products<br />
Impact of the Asian<br />
Financial Crisis<br />
The Asian financial crisis<br />
further exacerbated the<br />
industry’s problems.<br />
Metric Tons (thous<strong>and</strong>s)<br />
800<br />
700<br />
600<br />
SAIL<br />
TISCO<br />
ESSAR<br />
RINL<br />
500<br />
Domestic <strong>Steel</strong> Prices. Lowcost<br />
imports (mostly from<br />
400<br />
Russia <strong>and</strong> the other former<br />
300<br />
Soviet Republics)<br />
significantly depressed<br />
200<br />
domestic prices. While it does<br />
100<br />
not appear that a large<br />
0<br />
quantity of imports entered<br />
FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99<br />
India, steel consumers could<br />
Source: CMA India.<br />
pressure domestic producers<br />
into lowering prices. Indian<br />
steel makers that competed<br />
6-11. Exports of India’s Major Producers<br />
against imports from Russia<br />
<strong>and</strong> other former Soviet<br />
Republics faced foreign prices as low as $180 per MT. 146 Domestic prices for hot-rolled coil dropped<br />
from a high of more than $330 per MT to less than $195 per MT over the course of 1998. 147 Prices of<br />
most domestic steel products declined precipitously in 1998, eliminating the profit margins of<br />
domestic producers. 148<br />
Declining Exports. Indian producers also faced a loss of dem<strong>and</strong> abroad, particularly in the southeast<br />
Asian markets on which Indian steel producers had depended. India’s total steel exports to the region fell by<br />
25 percent from FY 1996–1997 to FY 1997–1998. 149<br />
Total exports fell another 18 percent in the next fiscal year, 150 forcing producers to lower crude steel<br />
capacity utilization from 76 percent in FY 1997–1998 to 71 percent in FY 1998–1999 (Chart 6-11). 151<br />
Chapter 6: New Players in the <strong>Global</strong> Market—India 165