09.03.2014 Views

Global Steel Trade; Structural Problems and Future Solutions

Global Steel Trade; Structural Problems and Future Solutions

Global Steel Trade; Structural Problems and Future Solutions

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Production Shares (percent)<br />

Production Shares (percent)<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

Kobe Sumitomo NKK Kawasaki Nippon<br />

10<br />

0<br />

1978 1981 1984 1987 1990 1993 1996 1999<br />

100<br />

Source: Corporate financial statements filed with Ministry of Finance, Table D.<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

3-18. Japanese Crude <strong>Steel</strong> Production Shares for the Five<br />

Major Producers (years ending March 31)<br />

Nucor<br />

LTV<br />

Armco/AK<br />

Inl<strong>and</strong><br />

National<br />

Republic<br />

Bethlehem<br />

USX<br />

0<br />

1976 1979 1982 1985 1988 1991 1994 1997<br />

Source: Financial Dynamics of 61 International <strong>Steel</strong>makers, Paine Webber.<br />

3-19. U.S. Crude <strong>Steel</strong> Production Shares Including<br />

the Top Five Companies<br />

just over 40 percent of<br />

production, followed by NKK<br />

at 18 percent, Kawasaki <strong>and</strong><br />

Sumitomo at 16 percent, <strong>and</strong><br />

Kobe at 9 percent (Chart<br />

3-18).<br />

By comparison, crude steel<br />

production for the top five U.S.<br />

producers over the same time<br />

period shows no clear pattern<br />

(Chart 3-19). Moreover, new<br />

U.S. companies have broken<br />

into the top five over time,<br />

while others have dropped<br />

out—a dynamic that has been<br />

absent in the Japanese steel<br />

industry.<br />

Unchanging production shares<br />

among Japan’s top steel<br />

producers dating back to the<br />

mid-1970s was a cause for<br />

concern for Japan’s Fair <strong>Trade</strong><br />

Commission in a 1994 industry<br />

survey. While the JFTC did not<br />

formally conclude that a cartel<br />

exists among Japanese<br />

producers, it noted the longterm<br />

rigidity in production<br />

shares, <strong>and</strong> expressed concern<br />

that “in an oligopolistic<br />

industry, even a minor<br />

exchange of information can<br />

easily bring about a common<br />

intention regarding supply<br />

quantities.” 12 Since then,<br />

production shares remained<br />

constant through the time of<br />

the export surge. The Japanese<br />

government has not revisited<br />

the issue of the lack of<br />

competition. A number of experts suggest that, aside from simply tolerating such behavior, the Ministry of<br />

International <strong>Trade</strong> <strong>and</strong> Industry (MITI) plays a role in overseeing the allocation of production shares<br />

among firms, albeit in a less active manner than in past decades. 13<br />

Given the many variables that affect a major industry like steel—e.g., different investment rates <strong>and</strong> labor<br />

<strong>and</strong> production changes—the ability of these producers to maintain constant production shares over such a<br />

long period is highly unusual, <strong>and</strong> cannot be written off as a coincidence. Instead, as a number of experts<br />

have observed, it is indicative of industry coordination to control production dating back to the creation of<br />

Nippon <strong>Steel</strong> in the 1970s <strong>and</strong> continuing through the 1990s.<br />

68 <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Steel</strong> <strong>Trade</strong>: <strong>Structural</strong> <strong>Problems</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Future</strong> <strong>Solutions</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!