09.03.2014 Views

Global Steel Trade; Structural Problems and Future Solutions

Global Steel Trade; Structural Problems and Future Solutions

Global Steel Trade; Structural Problems and Future Solutions

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

on all sales made by India’s integrated producers; essentially, SAIL <strong>and</strong> TISCO were the major contributors. The<br />

proceeds from this levy were then remitted to the Joint Plant Committee (JPC), which then administered long-term<br />

loans from the fund at favorable rates. The steel producers’ contributions to the fund were determined by their<br />

volume of production, <strong>and</strong> only those producers that contributed to the fund were eligible to receive monies from it.<br />

In late 1998, Essar <strong>Steel</strong>, Ispat Industries, <strong>and</strong> Lloyds <strong>Steel</strong> went to the Finance Ministry to request that the SDF<br />

cease giving “concessional rates” to SAIL <strong>and</strong> TISCO.<br />

165. CMA-India.<br />

166. Interview with Indian investment banking executive by Department of Commerce officials, March, 2000,<br />

Mumbai, India.<br />

167. Interviews with Indian banking experts <strong>and</strong> Indian steel company officials by Department of Commerce<br />

officials, February, March, 2000, Mumbai, India.<br />

168. Singdha Sengupta, “Essar, Ispat, Lloyds Cry Foul Over SDF Loans for <strong>Steel</strong> Majors,” New St<strong>and</strong>ard,<br />

Calcutta, November, 13, 1998.<br />

169. CMA-India.<br />

170. “Floor prices for imported hot-rolled spur debate in India.”Iron Age New <strong>Steel</strong>, June 1999.<br />

171. JPC, Performance Review, 52.<br />

172. CMA-India.<br />

173. See 2000 National <strong>Trade</strong> Estimates Report on Foreign <strong>Trade</strong> Barriers, Office of the United States <strong>Trade</strong><br />

Representative, March 2000.<br />

174. For example, tariffs on steel products in Brazil range from 9 to 19 percent. CMA-Brazil.<br />

175. CMA-India.<br />

176. Note: The programs discussed have been found to be countervailable by the Commerce Department , ITC,<br />

Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality <strong>Steel</strong> Plate From India, 64 FR 73131 (December 29, 1999). [Hereinafter CTL<br />

Plate Final]<br />

177. Competition in Indian Industries, by N. Ravich<strong>and</strong>rau.<br />

178. On March 31, 2000, the Indian government announced that the SIL program will have been completely<br />

eliminated by March 31, 2001, in compliance with India’s WTO obligations <strong>and</strong> pursuant to a WTO dispute<br />

settlement panel determination in response to a complaint (WT/DS90/1) filed by the United States. See Cable: New<br />

Delhi 2171 Routine.<br />

179. Ministry of Commerce, H<strong>and</strong>book of Procedures, Volume I, April 1, 1997 thru March 31, 2002 (incorporating<br />

amendments made up to 13th April, 1998).<br />

180. The receipt <strong>and</strong> use of a SIL does not exempt a company from having to pay the import duty on the imported<br />

item.<br />

181. CTL Plate Final.<br />

182. According to the Government of India, the passbook program was discontinued on April 1, 1997. However,<br />

exporters can, conceivably, continue to use credits earned under the PBS program until their credits have been used<br />

up or until March 31, 2000. Id.<br />

183. Id.<br />

184. “Probity Sector Update <strong>Steel</strong>,” Indiainfoline, September, 1999.<br />

185. Id.<br />

186. “<strong>Steel</strong>-makers form Indofer to Help Boost Usage,” by Rajarshi Roy. India Times, December 25, 1998.<br />

187. Id.<br />

188. Represents the overall index of six infrastructural industries as reported by <strong>Steel</strong>world, Indian <strong>Steel</strong> News<br />

Digest, May, 2000.<br />

189. Id.<br />

190. JPC, Performance Review, 11–12.<br />

191. TISCO has spent approximately US$1.9 billion on modernization projects in the last decade. Interview with<br />

Indian investment banking executive by Department of Commerce officials, March, 2000, Mumbai, India.<br />

192. JPC, Performance Review, 78.<br />

193. CMA-India, Tables 5 <strong>and</strong> 12.<br />

194. Not only do the companies employ large numbers of people, they bear a large part of the country’s<br />

infrastructure burden. <strong>Steel</strong> companies have traditionally built entire towns (roads, schools, hospitals, etc.) surrounding<br />

their plants, <strong>and</strong> to a large extent serve as a surrogate for social programs. Moreover, India does not have a social<br />

security system, or any other type of old age security. This places a large emphasis on longevity of employment, <strong>and</strong><br />

makes it more difficult for companies to reduce their workforces without costly measures such as voluntary retirement.<br />

234 <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Steel</strong> <strong>Trade</strong>: <strong>Structural</strong> <strong>Problems</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Future</strong> <strong>Solutions</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!