09.03.2014 Views

Global Steel Trade; Structural Problems and Future Solutions

Global Steel Trade; Structural Problems and Future Solutions

Global Steel Trade; Structural Problems and Future Solutions

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Three factors contributed to tipping the Japanese economy into recession beginning in 1997 after posting<br />

5.1 percent real GDP growth in 1996. First, fiscal policy turned sharply contractionary, as cuts in public<br />

works spending reduced public dem<strong>and</strong> by almost 1 percent of GDP while tax increases hit private<br />

dem<strong>and</strong>. Second, the Asia financial crisis, which began in the second half of 1997, contributed to a decline<br />

in foreign dem<strong>and</strong>, with goods <strong>and</strong> services exports down 5.6 percent between the second quarter of 1997<br />

<strong>and</strong> the fourth quarter of 1998. 74 Finally, the failures of a major bank <strong>and</strong> securities firm in the fall of<br />

1997 75 adversely affected business <strong>and</strong> consumer confidence, <strong>and</strong> contributed to a sharp decline in the<br />

supply of bank credit. 76<br />

In late 1997 <strong>and</strong> 1998, Japanese banks were criticized by domestic firms for generating a credit crunch,<br />

apparently as they withheld new credit to questionable borrowers <strong>and</strong> worked on shoring up their balance<br />

sheets. Though gross bank lending had declined in 1997, it fell by more than 2 percent in 1998 <strong>and</strong> more<br />

than double that in 1999. 77<br />

After an initial delay, the Japanese government responded to the deteriorating situation with significant policy<br />

steps in a number of areas. To compensate for the drop in private sector dem<strong>and</strong>, the government reversed its<br />

contractionary fiscal stance, increased spending in initial <strong>and</strong> supplemental budgets, <strong>and</strong> provided tax incentives<br />

for such items as housing. 78 To stabilize the financial sector <strong>and</strong> reduce the risk of systemic crisis, the Japanese<br />

government passed several key legislative measures in 1998, including the provision of substantial public funds,<br />

with toughened conditionality for bank recapitalization with those funds. 79<br />

It is often said that Japanese banks have provided loans based on their relationships with their borrowers,<br />

rather than on projections of future company cash flow or other risk-based assessment screening. 80 The<br />

1999 Economic Report of the President, in a generalized discussion of the merits of market-based versus<br />

relationship-based finance, noted that the best example of this in Japan was “the ‘main bank’ relationship<br />

that many established firms traditionally have with their primary lenders.” 81 This appears to be the case<br />

particularly in keiretsu groupings. The report goes on to outline the perceived benefits of such a system, but<br />

Japan’s Faltering Domestic Market in the 1990s<br />

The loss of Japanese steel dem<strong>and</strong> during the 1990s was severe <strong>and</strong> prolonged. Japanese steel<br />

dem<strong>and</strong> overall fell nearly 30 percent, <strong>and</strong> the fall in dem<strong>and</strong> for certain products was even more<br />

severe. Hot-rolled sheet dem<strong>and</strong>, for instance, dropped by 45 percent in the domestic market over the<br />

past decade. The fall in domestic steel dem<strong>and</strong> was not a short-term phenomenon, but was instead a<br />

long-term structural decline that coincided with Japan’s deeper economic problems, including the<br />

crash of Japan’s stock market in 1990, the end of the construction boom, <strong>and</strong> the movement of<br />

Japanese automobile plants overseas. The high prices charged by the steel producers themselves<br />

also contribute to the problem of low dem<strong>and</strong>.<br />

This loss in domestic dem<strong>and</strong>, coupled with the retention of production capacity levels in the 1990s,<br />

aggravated what is often recognized as a longst<strong>and</strong>ing problem of surplus capacity for Japanese<br />

producers. Most of the sources that have characterized Japan’s steel industry as having substantial<br />

surplus capacity in the late 1990s view the fall of domestic dem<strong>and</strong> over the last ten years as the<br />

leading cause. A 1999 report by a MITI-sponsored committee discussing structural problems facing<br />

the steel industry stated that over 15 percent of total capacity—or about 17 million MT—was a longterm<br />

“surplus,” a figure consistent with other measures of Japanese excess capacity.<br />

Numerous Japanese industry experts interviewed for this report recognized that surplus steel<br />

capacity has, in fact, long been a problem for the Japanese steel industry, dating back to a capacity<br />

buildup that resulted in industry-wide capacity of approximately 140 million MT by the early 1980s.<br />

While Japanese producers had taken some steps to cut capacity in the late 1980s, any major<br />

capacity cuts had ceased by the early 1990s.<br />

Chapter 3: Behind the Crisis—Japan 79

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!